1 $Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/README.SIEVE,v 1.5 2005/06/17 10:47:05 ph10 Exp $
3 Notes on the Sieve implementation for Exim
5 Exim Filter Versus Sieve Filter
7 Exim supports two incompatible filters: The traditional Exim filter and
8 the Sieve filter. Since Sieve is a extensible language, it is important
9 to understand "Sieve" in this context as "the specific implementation
12 The Exim filter contains more features, such as variable expansion, and
13 better integration with the host environment, like external processes
16 Sieve is a standard for interoperable filters, defined in RFC 3028,
17 with multiple implementations around. If interoperability is important,
18 then there is no way around it.
23 The Exim Sieve implementation offers the core as defined by RFC 3028bis,
24 the "envelope" (RFC 3028), the "fileinto" (RFC 3028), the "copy" (RFC
25 3894) and the "vacation" (draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-02.txt) extension,
26 the "i;ascii-numeric" comparator, but not the "reject" extension.
27 Exim does not support MDMs, so adding it just to the sieve filter makes
30 The Sieve filter is integrated in Exim and works very similar to the
31 Exim filter: Sieve scripts are recognized by the first line containing
32 "# sieve filter". When using "keep" or "fileinto" to save a mail into a
33 folder, the resulting string is available as the variable $address_file
34 in the transport that stores it. A suitable transport could be:
38 file = ${if eq{$address_file}{inbox} \
39 {/var/mail/$local_part} \
40 {${if eq{${substr_0_1:$address_file}}{/} \
42 {$home/$address_file} \
50 Absolute files are stored where specified, relative files are stored
51 relative to $home and "inbox" goes to the standard mailbox location.
53 To enable "vacation", set sieve_vacation_directory for the router to
54 the directory where vacation databases are held (don't put anything
55 else in that directory) and point reply_transport to an autoreply
61 Exim requires the first line to be "# sieve filter". Of course the RFC
62 does not enforce that line. Don't expect examples to work without adding
65 RFC 3028 requires using CRLF to terminate the end of a line.
66 The rationale was that CRLF is universally used in network protocols
67 to mark the end of the line. This implementation does not embed Sieve
68 in a network protocol, but uses Sieve scripts as part of the Exim MTA.
69 Since all parts of Exim use \n as newline character, this implementation
70 does, too. You can change this by defining the macro RFC_EOL at compile
71 time to enforce CRLF being used.
73 Exim violates RFC 2822, section 3.6.8, by accepting 8-bit header names, so
74 this implementation repeats this violation to stay consistent with Exim.
75 This is in preparation to UTF-8 data.
77 Sieve scripts can not contain NUL characters in strings, but mail
78 headers could contain MIME encoded NUL characters, which could never
79 be matched by Sieve scripts using exact comparisons. For that reason,
80 this implementation extends the Sieve quoted string syntax with \0
81 to describe a NUL character, violating \0 being the same as 0 in
82 RFC 3028. Even without using \0, the following tests are all true in
83 this implementation. Implementations that use C-style strings will only
84 evaulate the first test as true.
86 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?abc=00def
88 header :contains "Subject" ["abc"]
89 header :contains "Subject" ["def"]
90 header :matches "Subject" ["abc?def"]
92 Note that by considering Sieve to be a MUA, RFC 2047 can be interpreted
93 in a way that NUL characters truncating strings is allowed for Sieve
94 implementations, although not recommended. It is further allowed to use
95 encoded NUL characters in headers, but that's not recommended either.
96 The above example shows why. Good code should still be able to deal
99 RFC 3028 states that if an implementation fails to convert a character
100 set to UTF-8, two strings can not be equal if one contains octects greater
101 than 127. Assuming that all unknown character sets are one-byte character
102 sets with the lower 128 octects being US-ASCII is not sound, so this
103 implementation violates RFC 3028 and treats such MIME words literally.
104 That way at least something could be matched.
106 The folder specified by "fileinto" must not contain the character
107 sequence ".." to avoid security problems. RFC 3028 does not specifiy the
108 syntax of folders apart from keep being equivalent to fileinto "INBOX".
109 This implementation uses "inbox" instead.
111 Sieve script errors currently cause that messages are silently filed into
112 "inbox". RFC 3028 requires that the user is notified of that condition.
113 This may be implemented in future by adding a header line to mails that
114 are filed into "inbox" due to an error in the filter.
117 Strings Containing Header Names Or Envelope Elements
119 RFC 3028 does not specify what happens if a string denoting a header
120 field or envelope element does not contain a valid name, e.g. it
121 contains a colon for a header or it is not "from" or "to" for envelopes.
122 This implementation generates an error instead of ignoring the header
123 field in order to ease script debugging, which fits in the common picture
127 Header Test With Invalid MIME Encoding In Header
129 Some MUAs process invalid base64 encoded data, generating junk.
130 Others ignore junk after seeing an equal sign in base64 encoded data.
131 RFC 2047 does not specify how to react in this case, other than stating
132 that a client must not forbid to process a message for that reason.
133 RFC 2045 specifies that invalid data should be ignored (appearantly
134 looking at end of line characters). It also specifies that invalid data
135 may lead to rejecting messages containing them (and there it appears to
136 talk about true encoding violations), which is a clear contradiction to
139 RFC 3028 does not specify how to process incorrect MIME words.
140 This implementation treats them literally, as it does if the word is
141 correct, but its character set can not be converted to UTF-8.
146 The keep command is equivalent to fileinto "inbox": It saves the
147 message and resets the implicit keep flag. It does not set the
148 implicit keep flag; there is no command to set it once it has
152 Semantics of Fileinto
154 RFC 3028 does not specify if "fileinto" tries to create a mail folder,
155 in case it does not exist. This implementation allows to configure
156 that aspect using the appendfile transport options "create_directory",
157 "create_file" and "file_must_exist". See the appendfile transport in
158 the Exim specification for details.
161 Semantics of Redirect
163 Sieve scripts are supposed to be interoperable between servers, so this
164 implementation does not allow redirecting mail to unqualified addresses,
165 because the domain would depend on the used system and on systems with
166 virtual mail domains it is probably not what the user expects it to be.
171 There has been confusion if the string arguments to "require" are to be
172 matched case-sensitive or not. The comparator default is case-insensitive
173 comparison, but "require" does not allow to specify a comparator, so
174 this default does not apply. Lacking a clear specification, matching
175 the strings exactly makes most sense. The same is valid for comparator
176 names, also specified as strings.
179 Sieve Syntax and Semantics
181 RFC 3028 confuses syntax and semantics sometimes. It uses a generic
182 grammar as syntax for actions and tests and performs many checks during
183 semantic analysis. Syntax is specified as grammar rule, semantics
184 with natural language, despire the latter often talking about syntax.
185 The intention was to provide a framework for the syntax that describes
186 current commands as well as future extensions, and describing commands
187 by semantics. Since the semantic analysis is not specified by formal
188 rules, it is easy to get that phase wrong, as demonstrated by the mistake
189 in RFC 3028 to forbid "elsif" being followed by "elsif" (which is allowed
190 in Sieve, it's just not specified correctly).
192 RFC 3028 does not define if semantic checks are strict (always treat
193 unknown extensions as errors) or lazy (treat unknown extensions as error,
194 if they are executed), and since it employs a very generic grammar,
195 it is not unreasonable for an implementation using a parser for the
196 generic grammar to indeed process scripts that contain unknown commands
197 in dead code. It is just required to treat disabled but known extensions
198 the same as unknown extensions.
200 The following suggestion for section 8.2 gives two grammars, one for
201 the framework, and one for specific commands, thus removing most of the
202 semantic analysis. Since the parser can not parse unsupported extensions,
203 the result is strict error checking. As required in section 2.10.5, known
204 but not enabled extensions must behave the same as unknown extensions,
205 so those also result strictly in errors (though at the thin semantic
206 layer), even if they can be parsed fine.
210 The atoms of the grammar are lexical tokens. White space or comments may
211 appear anywhere between lexical tokens, they are not part of the grammar.
212 The grammar is specified in ABNF with two extensions to describe tagged
213 arguments that can be reordered and grammar extensions: { } denotes a
214 sequence of symbols that may appear in any order. Example:
220 start = ( a b c ) / ( a c b ) / ( b a c ) / ( b c a ) / ( c a b ) / ( c b a )
222 The symbol =) is used to append to a rule:
231 All Sieve commands, including extensions, MUST be words of the following
232 generic grammar with the start symbol "start". They SHOULD be specified
233 using a specific grammar, though.
235 argument = string-list / number / tag
236 arguments = *argument [test / test-list]
237 block = "{" commands "}"
239 string = quoted-string / multi-line
240 string-list = "[" string *("," string) "]" / string
241 test = identifier arguments
242 test-list = "(" test *("," test) ")"
243 command = identifier arguments ( ";" / block )
246 The basic Sieve commands are specified using the following grammar, which
247 language is a subset of the generic grammar above. The start symbol is
250 address-part = ":localpart" / ":domain" / ":all"
251 comparator = ":comparator" string
252 match-type = ":is" / ":contains" / ":matches"
253 string = quoted-string / multi-line
254 string-list = "[" string *("," string) "]" / string
255 address-test = "address" { [address-part] [comparator] [match-type] }
256 string-list string-list
257 test-list = "(" test *("," test) ")"
258 allof-test = "allof" test-list
259 anyof-test = "anyof" test-list
260 exists-test = "exists" string-list
263 header-test = "header" { [comparator] [match-type] }
264 string-list string-list
265 not-test = "not" test
266 relop = ":over" / ":under"
267 size-test = "size" relop number
268 block = "{" commands "}"
269 if-command = "if" test block *( "elsif" test block ) [ "else" block ]
270 stop-command = "stop" { stop-options } ";"
272 keep-command = "keep" { keep-options } ";"
274 discard-command = "discard" { discard-options } ";"
276 redirect-command = "redirect" { redirect-options } string ";"
278 require-command = "require" { require-options } string-list ";"
280 test = address-test / allof-test / anyof-test / exists-test
281 / false-test / true-test / header-test / not-test
283 command = if-command / stop-command / keep-command
284 / discard-command / redirect-command
286 start = *require-command commands
288 The extensions "envelope" and "fileinto" are specified using the following
291 envelope-test = "envelope" { [comparator] [address-part] [match-type] }
292 string-list string-list
293 test =/ envelope-test
295 fileinto-command = "fileinto" { fileinto-options } string ";"
297 command =/ fileinto-command
299 The extension "copy" is specified as:
301 fileinto-options =) ":copy"
302 redirect-options =) ":copy"
305 The i;ascii-numeric Comparator
307 RFC 2244 describes this comparator and specifies that non-numeric strings
308 are considered equal with an ordinal value higher than any numeric string.
309 Although not stated explicitly, this includes the empty string. A range
310 of at least 2^31 is required. This implementation does not limit the
311 range, because it does not convert numbers to binary representation
312 before comparing them.
315 The vacation extension
317 The extension "vacation" is specified using the following grammar
320 vacation-command = "vacation" { vacation-options } <reason: string>
321 vacation-options = [":days" number]
324 [":addresses" string-list]
327 command =/ vacation-command
332 The draft does not specify how strings using MIME entities are used
333 to compose messages. As a result, different implementations generate
334 different mails. The Exim Sieve implementation splits the reason into
335 header and body. It adds the header to the mail header and uses the body
336 as mail body. Be aware, that other imlementations compose a multipart
337 structure with the reason as only part. Both conform to the specification
341 Semantics Of Not Using ":mime"
343 Sieve scripts are written in UTF-8, so is the reason string in this
344 case. This implementation adds MIME headers to indicate that. This
345 is not required by the vacation draft, which does not specify how
346 the UTF-8 reason is processed to compose the resulting message.
351 The draft specifies that the default message subject is "Auto: " plus
352 the old subject. Using this subject is dangerous, because many mailing
353 lists verify addresses by sending a secret key in the subject of a
354 message, asking to reply to the message for confirmation. Using the
355 default vacation subject confirms any subscription request of this kind,
356 allowing to subscribe a third party to any mailing list, either to annoy
357 the user or to declare spam as legitimate mail by proving to use opt-in.
360 Rate Limiting Responses
362 In absence of a handle, this implementation hashes the reason,
363 ":subject" option, ":mime" option and ":from" option and uses the hex
364 string representation as filename within the "sieve_vacation_directory"
365 to store the recipient addresses for this vacation parameter set.
367 The draft specifies that sites may define a minimum ":days" value than 1.
368 This implementation uses 1. The maximum value MUST greater than 7,
369 and SHOULD be greater than 30. This implementation uses a maximum of 31.
371 Vacation recipient address databases older than 31 days are automatically
372 removed. Users do not have to remove them manually when modifying their
373 scripts. Don't put anything but vacation databases in that directory
374 or you risk that it will be removed, too!
377 Global Reply Address Blacklist
379 The draft requires that each implementation offers a global black list
380 of addresses that will never be replied to. Exim offers this as option
381 "never_mail" in the autoreply transport.