1 From time to time, experimental features may be added to Exim.
2 While a feature is experimental, there will be a build-time
3 option whose name starts "EXPERIMENTAL_" that must be set in
4 order to include the feature. This file contains information
5 about experimental features, all of which are unstable and
6 liable to incompatible change.
10 --------------------------------------------------------------
12 Per-Recipient Data Reponse is an SMTP extension proposed by Eric Hall
13 in a (now-expired) IETF draft from 2007. It's not hit mainstream
14 use, but has apparently been implemented in the META1 MTA.
16 There is mention at http://mail.aegee.org/intern/sendmail.html
17 of a patch to sendmail "to make it PRDR capable".
19 ref: http://www.eric-a-hall.com/specs/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt
21 If Exim is built with EXPERIMENTAL_PRDR there is a new config
22 boolean "prdr_enable" which controls whether PRDR is advertised
23 as part of an EHLO response, a new "acl_data_smtp_prdr" ACL
24 (called for each recipient, after data arrives but before the
25 data ACL), and a new smtp transport option "hosts_try_prdr".
27 PRDR may be used to support per-user content filtering. Without it
28 one must defer any recipient after the first that has a different
29 content-filter configuration. With PRDR, the RCPT-time check
30 for this can be disabled when the MAIL-time $smtp_command included
31 "PRDR". Any required difference in behaviour of the main DATA-time
32 ACL should however depend on the PRDR-time ACL having run, as Exim
33 will avoid doing so in some situations (eg. single-recipient mails).
38 --------------------------------------------------------------
40 X.509 PKI certificates expire and can be revoked; to handle this, the
41 clients need some way to determine if a particular certificate, from a
42 particular Certificate Authority (CA), is still valid. There are three
45 The simplest way is to serve up a Certificate Revocation List (CRL) with
46 an ordinary web-server, regenerating the CRL before it expires. The
47 downside is that clients have to periodically re-download a potentially
48 huge file from every certificate authority it knows of.
50 The way with most moving parts at query time is Online Certificate
51 Status Protocol (OCSP), where the client verifies the certificate
52 against an OCSP server run by the CA. This lets the CA track all
53 usage of the certs. This requires running software with access to the
54 private key of the CA, to sign the responses to the OCSP queries. OCSP
55 is based on HTTP and can be proxied accordingly.
57 The only widespread OCSP server implementation (known to this writer)
58 comes as part of OpenSSL and aborts on an invalid request, such as
59 connecting to the port and then disconnecting. This requires
60 re-entering the passphrase each time some random client does this.
62 The third way is OCSP Stapling; in this, the server using a certificate
63 issued by the CA periodically requests an OCSP proof of validity from
64 the OCSP server, then serves it up inline as part of the TLS
65 negotiation. This approach adds no extra round trips, does not let the
66 CA track users, scales well with number of certs issued by the CA and is
67 resilient to temporary OCSP server failures, as long as the server
68 starts retrying to fetch an OCSP proof some time before its current
69 proof expires. The downside is that it requires server support.
71 If Exim is built with EXPERIMENTAL_OCSP and it was built with OpenSSL,
72 then it gains one new option: "tls_ocsp_file".
74 The file specified therein is expected to be in DER format, and contain
75 an OCSP proof. Exim will serve it as part of the TLS handshake. This
76 option will be re-expanded for SNI, if the tls_certificate option
77 contains $tls_sni, as per other TLS options.
79 Exim does not at this time implement any support for fetching a new OCSP
80 proof. The burden is on the administrator to handle this, outside of
81 Exim. The file specified should be replaced atomically, so that the
82 contents are always valid. Exim will expand the "tls_ocsp_file" option
83 on each connection, so a new file will be handled transparently on the
86 Exim will check for a valid next update timestamp in the OCSP proof;
87 if not present, or if the proof has expired, it will be ignored.
89 At this point in time, we're gathering feedback on use, to determine if
90 it's worth adding complexity to the Exim daemon to periodically re-fetch
91 OCSP files and somehow handling multiple files. There is no client support
92 for OCSP in Exim, this is feature expected to be used by mail clients.
97 Brightmail AntiSpam (BMI) suppport
98 --------------------------------------------------------------
100 Brightmail AntiSpam is a commercial package. Please see
101 http://www.brightmail.com for more information on
102 the product. For the sake of clarity, we'll refer to it as
106 0) BMI concept and implementation overview
108 In contrast to how spam-scanning with SpamAssassin is
109 implemented in exiscan-acl, BMI is more suited for per
110 -recipient scanning of messages. However, each messages is
111 scanned only once, but multiple "verdicts" for multiple
112 recipients can be returned from the BMI server. The exiscan
113 implementation passes the message to the BMI server just
114 before accepting it. It then adds the retrieved verdicts to
115 the messages header file in the spool. These verdicts can then
116 be queried in routers, where operation is per-recipient
117 instead of per-message. To use BMI, you need to take the
120 1) Compile Exim with BMI support
121 2) Set up main BMI options (top section of Exim config file)
122 3) Set up ACL control statement (ACL section of the config
124 4) Set up your routers to use BMI verdicts (routers section
126 5) (Optional) Set up per-recipient opt-in information.
128 These four steps are explained in more details below.
130 1) Adding support for BMI at compile time
132 To compile with BMI support, you need to link Exim against
133 the Brighmail client SDK, consisting of a library
134 (libbmiclient_single.so) and a header file (bmi_api.h).
135 You'll also need to explicitly set a flag in the Makefile to
136 include BMI support in the Exim binary. Both can be achieved
137 with these lines in Local/Makefile:
139 EXPERIMENTAL_BRIGHTMAIL=yes
140 CFLAGS=-I/path/to/the/dir/with/the/includefile
141 EXTRALIBS_EXIM=-L/path/to/the/dir/with/the/library -lbmiclient_single
143 If you use other CFLAGS or EXTRALIBS_EXIM settings then
144 merge the content of these lines with them.
146 Note for BMI6.x users: You'll also have to add -lxml2_single
147 to the EXTRALIBS_EXIM line. Users of 5.5x do not need to do
150 You should also include the location of
151 libbmiclient_single.so in your dynamic linker configuration
152 file (usually /etc/ld.so.conf) and run "ldconfig"
153 afterwards, or else the produced Exim binary will not be
154 able to find the library file.
157 2) Setting up BMI support in the Exim main configuration
159 To enable BMI support in the main Exim configuration, you
160 should set the path to the main BMI configuration file with
161 the "bmi_config_file" option, like this:
163 bmi_config_file = /opt/brightmail/etc/brightmail.cfg
165 This must go into section 1 of Exim's configuration file (You
166 can put it right on top). If you omit this option, it
167 defaults to /opt/brightmail/etc/brightmail.cfg.
169 Note for BMI6.x users: This file is in XML format in V6.xx
170 and its name is /opt/brightmail/etc/bmiconfig.xml. So BMI
171 6.x users MUST set the bmi_config_file option.
174 3) Set up ACL control statement
176 To optimize performance, it makes sense only to process
177 messages coming from remote, untrusted sources with the BMI
178 server. To set up a messages for processing by the BMI
179 server, you MUST set the "bmi_run" control statement in any
180 ACL for an incoming message. You will typically do this in
181 an "accept" block in the "acl_check_rcpt" ACL. You should
182 use the "accept" block(s) that accept messages from remote
183 servers for your own domain(s). Here is an example that uses
184 the "accept" blocks from Exim's default configuration file:
187 accept domains = +local_domains
192 accept domains = +relay_to_domains
197 If bmi_run is not set in any ACL during reception of the
198 message, it will NOT be passed to the BMI server.
201 4) Setting up routers to use BMI verdicts
203 When a message has been run through the BMI server, one or
204 more "verdicts" are present. Different recipients can have
205 different verdicts. Each recipient is treated individually
206 during routing, so you can query the verdicts by recipient
207 at that stage. From Exim's view, a verdict can have the
210 o deliver the message normally
211 o deliver the message to an alternate location
212 o do not deliver the message
214 To query the verdict for a recipient, the implementation
215 offers the following tools:
218 - Boolean router preconditions. These can be used in any
219 router. For a simple implementation of BMI, these may be
220 all that you need. The following preconditions are
223 o bmi_deliver_default
225 This precondition is TRUE if the verdict for the
226 recipient is to deliver the message normally. If the
227 message has not been processed by the BMI server, this
228 variable defaults to TRUE.
230 o bmi_deliver_alternate
232 This precondition is TRUE if the verdict for the
233 recipient is to deliver the message to an alternate
234 location. You can get the location string from the
235 $bmi_alt_location expansion variable if you need it. See
236 further below. If the message has not been processed by
237 the BMI server, this variable defaults to FALSE.
241 This precondition is TRUE if the verdict for the
242 recipient is NOT to deliver the message to the
243 recipient. You will typically use this precondition in a
244 top-level blackhole router, like this:
246 # don't deliver messages handled by the BMI server
252 This router should be on top of all others, so messages
253 that should not be delivered do not reach other routers
254 at all. If the message has not been processed by
255 the BMI server, this variable defaults to FALSE.
258 - A list router precondition to query if rules "fired" on
259 the message for the recipient. Its name is "bmi_rule". You
260 use it by passing it a colon-separated list of rule
261 numbers. You can use this condition to route messages that
262 matched specific rules. Here is an example:
264 # special router for BMI rule #5, #8 and #11
268 data = postmaster@mydomain.com
271 - Expansion variables. Several expansion variables are set
272 during routing. You can use them in custom router
273 conditions, for example. The following variables are
276 o $bmi_base64_verdict
278 This variable will contain the BASE64 encoded verdict
279 for the recipient being routed. You can use it to add a
280 header to messages for tracking purposes, for example:
285 headers_add = X-Brightmail-Verdict: $bmi_base64_verdict
286 transport = local_delivery
288 If there is no verdict available for the recipient being
289 routed, this variable contains the empty string.
291 o $bmi_base64_tracker_verdict
293 This variable will contain a BASE64 encoded subset of
294 the verdict information concerning the "rules" that
295 fired on the message. You can add this string to a
296 header, commonly named "X-Brightmail-Tracker". Example:
301 headers_add = X-Brightmail-Tracker: $bmi_base64_tracker_verdict
302 transport = local_delivery
304 If there is no verdict available for the recipient being
305 routed, this variable contains the empty string.
309 If the verdict is to redirect the message to an
310 alternate location, this variable will contain the
311 alternate location string returned by the BMI server. In
312 its default configuration, this is a header-like string
313 that can be added to the message with "headers_add". If
314 there is no verdict available for the recipient being
315 routed, or if the message is to be delivered normally,
316 this variable contains the empty string.
320 This is an additional integer variable that can be used
321 to query if the message should be delivered at all. You
322 should use router preconditions instead if possible.
324 $bmi_deliver is '0': the message should NOT be delivered.
325 $bmi_deliver is '1': the message should be delivered.
328 IMPORTANT NOTE: Verdict inheritance.
329 The message is passed to the BMI server during message
330 reception, using the target addresses from the RCPT TO:
331 commands in the SMTP transaction. If recipients get expanded
332 or re-written (for example by aliasing), the new address(es)
333 inherit the verdict from the original address. This means
334 that verdicts also apply to all "child" addresses generated
335 from top-level addresses that were sent to the BMI server.
338 5) Using per-recipient opt-in information (Optional)
340 The BMI server features multiple scanning "profiles" for
341 individual recipients. These are usually stored in a LDAP
342 server and are queried by the BMI server itself. However,
343 you can also pass opt-in data for each recipient from the
344 MTA to the BMI server. This is particularly useful if you
345 already look up recipient data in Exim anyway (which can
346 also be stored in a SQL database or other source). This
347 implementation enables you to pass opt-in data to the BMI
348 server in the RCPT ACL. This works by setting the
349 'bmi_optin' modifier in a block of that ACL. If should be
350 set to a list of comma-separated strings that identify the
351 features which the BMI server should use for that particular
352 recipient. Ideally, you would use the 'bmi_optin' modifier
353 in the same ACL block where you set the 'bmi_run' control
354 flag. Here is an example that will pull opt-in data for each
355 recipient from a flat file called
356 '/etc/exim/bmi_optin_data'.
360 user1@mydomain.com: <OPTIN STRING1>:<OPTIN STRING2>
361 user2@thatdomain.com: <OPTIN STRING3>
366 accept domains = +relay_to_domains
369 bmi_optin = ${lookup{$local_part@$domain}lsearch{/etc/exim/bmi_optin_data}}
372 Of course, you can also use any other lookup method that
373 Exim supports, including LDAP, Postgres, MySQL, Oracle etc.,
374 as long as the result is a list of colon-separated opt-in
377 For a list of available opt-in strings, please contact your
378 Brightmail representative.
383 Sender Policy Framework (SPF) support
384 --------------------------------------------------------------
386 To learn more about SPF, visit http://www.openspf.org. This
387 document does not explain the SPF fundamentals, you should
388 read and understand the implications of deploying SPF on your
389 system before doing so.
391 SPF support is added via the libspf2 library. Visit
393 http://www.libspf2.org/
395 to obtain a copy, then compile and install it. By default,
396 this will put headers in /usr/local/include and the static
397 library in /usr/local/lib.
399 To compile Exim with SPF support, set these additional flags in
403 CFLAGS=-DSPF -I/usr/local/include
404 EXTRALIBS_EXIM=-L/usr/local/lib -lspf2
406 This assumes that the libspf2 files are installed in
407 their default locations.
409 You can now run SPF checks in incoming SMTP by using the "spf"
410 ACL condition in either the MAIL, RCPT or DATA ACLs. When
411 using it in the RCPT ACL, you can make the checks dependent on
412 the RCPT address (or domain), so you can check SPF records
413 only for certain target domains. This gives you the
414 possibility to opt-out certain customers that do not want
415 their mail to be subject to SPF checking.
417 The spf condition takes a list of strings on its right-hand
418 side. These strings describe the outcome of the SPF check for
419 which the spf condition should succeed. Valid strings are:
421 o pass The SPF check passed, the sending host
422 is positively verified by SPF.
423 o fail The SPF check failed, the sending host
424 is NOT allowed to send mail for the domain
425 in the envelope-from address.
426 o softfail The SPF check failed, but the queried
427 domain can't absolutely confirm that this
429 o none The queried domain does not publish SPF
431 o neutral The SPF check returned a "neutral" state.
432 This means the queried domain has published
433 a SPF record, but wants to allow outside
434 servers to send mail under its domain as well.
435 o err_perm This indicates a syntax error in the SPF
436 record of the queried domain. This should be
438 o err_temp This indicates a temporary error during all
439 processing, including Exim's SPF processing.
440 You may defer messages when this occurs.
442 You can prefix each string with an exclamation mark to invert
443 is meaning, for example "!fail" will match all results but
444 "fail". The string list is evaluated left-to-right, in a
445 short-circuit fashion. When a string matches the outcome of
446 the SPF check, the condition succeeds. If none of the listed
447 strings matches the outcome of the SPF check, the condition
450 Here is an example to fail forgery attempts from domains that
454 deny message = $sender_host_address is not allowed to send mail from ${if def:sender_address_domain {$sender_address_domain}{$sender_helo_name}}. \
455 Please see http://www.openspf.org/Why?scope=${if def:sender_address_domain {mfrom}{helo}};identity=${if def:sender_address_domain {$sender_address}{$sender_helo_name}};ip=$sender_host_address
457 --------------------- */
459 You can also give special treatment to specific domains:
462 deny message = AOL sender, but not from AOL-approved relay.
463 sender_domains = aol.com
465 --------------------- */
467 Explanation: AOL publishes SPF records, but is liberal and
468 still allows non-approved relays to send mail from aol.com.
469 This will result in a "neutral" state, while mail from genuine
470 AOL servers will result in "pass". The example above takes
471 this into account and treats "neutral" like "fail", but only
472 for aol.com. Please note that this violates the SPF draft.
474 When the spf condition has run, it sets up several expansion
478 This contains a human-readable string describing the outcome
479 of the SPF check. You can add it to a custom header or use
480 it for logging purposes.
483 This contains a complete Received-SPF: header that can be
484 added to the message. Please note that according to the SPF
485 draft, this header must be added at the top of the header
486 list. Please see section 10 on how you can do this.
488 Note: in case of "Best-guess" (see below), the convention is
489 to put this string in a header called X-SPF-Guess: instead.
492 This contains the outcome of the SPF check in string form,
493 one of pass, fail, softfail, none, neutral, err_perm or
497 This contains a string that can be used in a SMTP response
498 to the calling party. Useful for "fail".
500 In addition to SPF, you can also perform checks for so-called
501 "Best-guess". Strictly speaking, "Best-guess" is not standard
502 SPF, but it is supported by the same framework that enables SPF
503 capability. Refer to http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Best_guess_record
504 for a description of what it means.
506 To access this feature, simply use the spf_guess condition in place
507 of the spf one. For example:
510 deny message = $sender_host_address doesn't look trustworthy to me
512 --------------------- */
514 In case you decide to reject messages based on this check, you
515 should note that although it uses the same framework, "Best-guess"
516 is NOT SPF, and therefore you should not mention SPF at all in your
519 When the spf_guess condition has run, it sets up the same expansion
520 variables as when spf condition is run, described above.
522 Additionally, since Best-guess is not standardized, you may redefine
523 what "Best-guess" means to you by redefining spf_guess variable in
524 global config. For example, the following:
527 spf_guess = v=spf1 a/16 mx/16 ptr ?all
528 --------------------- */
530 would relax host matching rules to a broader network range.
533 SRS (Sender Rewriting Scheme) Support
534 --------------------------------------------------------------
536 Exiscan currently includes SRS support via Miles Wilton's
537 libsrs_alt library. The current version of the supported
540 In order to use SRS, you must get a copy of libsrs_alt from
542 http://srs.mirtol.com/
544 Unpack the tarball, then refer to MTAs/README.EXIM
545 to proceed. You need to set
549 in your Local/Makefile.
553 --------------------------------------------------------------
557 In order to build exim with DCC support add
561 to your Makefile. (Re-)build/install exim. exim -d should show
562 EXPERIMENTAL_DCC under "Support for".
567 In the main section of exim.cf add at least
568 dccifd_address = /usr/local/dcc/var/dccifd
570 dccifd_address = <ip> <port>
572 In the DATA ACL you can use the new condition
575 After that "$dcc_header" contains the X-DCC-Header.
578 fail for overall "R", "G" from dccifd
579 defer for overall "T" from dccifd
580 accept for overall "A", "S" from dccifd
582 dcc = */defer_ok works as for spamd.
584 The "$dcc_result" variable contains the overall result from DCC
585 answer. There will an X-DCC: header added to the mail.
589 to greylist with DCC.
591 If you set, in the main section,
592 dcc_direct_add_header = true
593 then the dcc header will be added "in deep" and if the spool
594 file was already written it gets removed. This forces Exim to
595 write it again if needed. This helps to get the DCC Header
596 through to eg. SpamAssassin.
598 If you want to pass even more headers in the middle of the
599 DATA stage you can set
600 $acl_m_dcc_add_header
601 to tell the DCC routines add more information; eg, you might set
602 this to some results from ClamAV. Be careful. Header syntax is
603 not checked and is added "as is".
606 --------------------------------------------------------------
608 --------------------------------------------------------------