/* There isn't much we can do for syntactic disasters at this stage.
Pro tem (possibly for ever) ignore them.
/* There isn't much we can do for syntactic disasters at this stage.
Pro tem (possibly for ever) ignore them.
- If we got nothing, they there was any sort of error: non-parsable address,
+ If we got nothing, then there was any sort of error: non-parsable address,
empty address, overlong addres. Sometimes the result matters, sometimes not.
It seems this function is called for *any* header we see. */
if (!recipient)
{
empty address, overlong addres. Sometimes the result matters, sometimes not.
It seems this function is called for *any* header we see. */
if (!recipient)
{
+#if 0
+ /* FIXME:
+ This was(!) an attempt tho handle empty rewrits, but seemingly it
+ needs more effort to decide if the returned empty address matters.
+ Now this will now break test 471 again.
+
+ 471 fails now because it uses an overlong address, for wich parse_extract_address()
+ returns an empty address (which was not expected).
+
+ Checking the output and exit if rewrite_rules or routed_old are present
+ isn't a good idea either: It's enough to have *any* rewrite rule
+ in the configuration plus "To: undisclosed recpients:;" to exit(), which
+ is not what we want.
+ */
+
if (rewrite_rules || routed_old)
{
log_write(0, LOG_MAIN, "rewrite: %s", errmess);
exim_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
if (rewrite_rules || routed_old)
{
log_write(0, LOG_MAIN, "rewrite: %s", errmess);
exim_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
loop_reset_point = store_reset(loop_reset_point);
continue;
}
loop_reset_point = store_reset(loop_reset_point);
continue;
}