-/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/auths/spa.c,v 1.5 2006/02/07 11:19:01 ph10 Exp $ */
-
/*************************************************
* Exim - an Internet mail transport agent *
*************************************************/
-/* Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 1995 - 2006 */
+/* Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 1995 - 2018 */
/* See the file NOTICE for conditions of use and distribution. */
/* This file, which provides support for Microsoft's Secure Password
References:
http://www.innovation.ch/java/ntlm.html
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/28/1436/66154
+ http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/5/e/95ef66af-9026-4bb0-a41d-a4f81802d92c/%5bMS-SMTP%5d.pdf
* It seems that some systems have existing but different definitions of some
* of the following types. I received a complaint about "int16" causing
* typedef unsigned uint32;
* typedef unsigned char uint8;
-07-August-2003: PH: Patched up the code to avoid assert bombouts for stupid
- input data. Find appropriate comment by grepping for "PH".
+07-August-2003: PH: Patched up the code to avoid assert bombouts for stupid
+ input data. Find appropriate comment by grepping for "PH".
+16-October-2006: PH: Added a call to auth_check_serv_cond() at the end
+05-June-2010: PP: handle SASL initial response
*/
int auth_spa_options_count =
sizeof(auth_spa_options)/sizeof(optionlist);
-/* Default private options block for the contidion authentication method. */
+/* Default private options block for the condition authentication method. */
auth_spa_options_block auth_spa_option_defaults = {
NULL, /* spa_password */
};
+#ifdef MACRO_PREDEF
+
+/* Dummy values */
+void auth_spa_init(auth_instance *ablock) {}
+int auth_spa_server(auth_instance *ablock, uschar *data) {return 0;}
+int auth_spa_client(auth_instance *ablock, void * sx, int timeout,
+ uschar *buffer, int buffsize) {return 0;}
+
+#else /*!MACRO_PREDEF*/
+
+
+
+
/*************************************************
* Initialization entry point *
*************************************************/
/* For interface, see auths/README */
-#define CVAL(buf,pos) (((unsigned char *)(buf))[pos])
+#define CVAL(buf,pos) ((US (buf))[pos])
#define PVAL(buf,pos) ((unsigned)CVAL(buf,pos))
#define SVAL(buf,pos) (PVAL(buf,pos)|PVAL(buf,(pos)+1)<<8)
#define IVAL(buf,pos) (SVAL(buf,pos)|SVAL(buf,(pos)+2)<<16)
uschar msgbuf[2048];
uschar *clearpass;
-/* send a 334, MS Exchange style, and grab the client's request */
+/* send a 334, MS Exchange style, and grab the client's request,
+unless we already have it via an initial response. */
-if (auth_get_no64_data(&data, US"NTLM supported") != OK)
+if ((*data == '\0') &&
+ (auth_get_no64_data(&data, US"NTLM supported") != OK))
{
/* something borked */
return FAIL;
}
-if (spa_base64_to_bits((char *)(&request), sizeof(request), (const char *)(data)) < 0)
+if (spa_base64_to_bits(CS (&request), sizeof(request), CCS (data)) < 0)
{
DEBUG(D_auth) debug_printf("auth_spa_server(): bad base64 data in "
"request: %s\n", data);
}
/* dump client response */
-if (spa_base64_to_bits((char *)(&response), sizeof(response), (const char *)(data)) < 0)
+if (spa_base64_to_bits(CS (&response), sizeof(response), CCS (data)) < 0)
{
DEBUG(D_auth) debug_printf("auth_spa_server(): bad base64 data in "
"response: %s\n", data);
return FAIL;
}
-/* get username and put it in $1 */
-
/***************************************************************
PH 07-Aug-2003: The original code here was this:
/***************************************************************/
-expand_nstring[1] = msgbuf;
+/* Put the username in $auth1 and $1. The former is now the preferred variable;
+the latter is the original variable. These have to be out of stack memory, and
+need to be available once known even if not authenticated, for error messages
+(server_set_id, which only makes it to authenticated_id if we return OK) */
+
+auth_vars[0] = expand_nstring[1] = string_copy(msgbuf);
expand_nlength[1] = Ustrlen(msgbuf);
expand_nmax = 1;
+debug_print_string(ablock->server_debug_string); /* customized debug */
+
/* look up password */
clearpass = expand_string(ob->spa_serverpassword);
if (clearpass == NULL)
{
- if (expand_string_forcedfail)
+ if (f.expand_string_forcedfail)
{
DEBUG(D_auth) debug_printf("auth_spa_server(): forced failure while "
"expanding spa_serverpassword\n");
((unsigned char*)responseptr)+IVAL(&responseptr->ntResponse.offset,0),
24) == 0)
/* success. we have a winner. */
- return OK;
+ {
+ return auth_check_serv_cond(ablock);
+ }
+
+ /* Expand server_condition as an authorization check (PH) */
return FAIL;
}
int
auth_spa_client(
auth_instance *ablock, /* authenticator block */
- smtp_inblock *inblock, /* connection inblock */
- smtp_outblock *outblock, /* connection outblock */
+ void * sx, /* connection */
int timeout, /* command timeout */
uschar *buffer, /* buffer for reading response */
int buffsize) /* size of buffer */
{
- auth_spa_options_block *ob =
- (auth_spa_options_block *)(ablock->options_block);
- SPAAuthRequest request;
- SPAAuthChallenge challenge;
- SPAAuthResponse response;
- char msgbuf[2048];
- char *domain = NULL;
- char *username, *password;
-
- /* Code added by PH to expand the options */
-
- username = CS expand_string(ob->spa_username);
- if (username == NULL)
- {
- if (expand_string_forcedfail) return CANCELLED;
- string_format(buffer, buffsize, "expansion of \"%s\" failed in %s "
- "authenticator: %s", ob->spa_username, ablock->name,
- expand_string_message);
- return ERROR;
- }
-
- password = CS expand_string(ob->spa_password);
- if (password == NULL)
- {
- if (expand_string_forcedfail) return CANCELLED;
- string_format(buffer, buffsize, "expansion of \"%s\" failed in %s "
- "authenticator: %s", ob->spa_password, ablock->name,
- expand_string_message);
- return ERROR;
- }
-
- if (ob->spa_domain != NULL)
- {
- domain = CS expand_string(ob->spa_domain);
- if (domain == NULL)
- {
- if (expand_string_forcedfail) return CANCELLED;
- string_format(buffer, buffsize, "expansion of \"%s\" failed in %s "
- "authenticator: %s", ob->spa_domain, ablock->name,
- expand_string_message);
- return ERROR;
- }
- }
-
- /* Original code */
-
- if (smtp_write_command(outblock, FALSE, "AUTH %s\r\n",
- ablock->public_name) < 0)
- return FAIL_SEND;
-
- /* wait for the 3XX OK message */
- if (!smtp_read_response(inblock, (uschar *)buffer, buffsize, '3', timeout))
- return FAIL;
-
- DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: using domain %s\n\n",
- ablock->name, domain);
-
- spa_build_auth_request (&request, CS username, domain);
- spa_bits_to_base64 (US msgbuf, (unsigned char*)&request,
- spa_request_length(&request));
-
- DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: sending request (%s)\n\n", ablock->name,
- msgbuf);
-
- /* send the encrypted password */
- if (smtp_write_command(outblock, FALSE, "%s\r\n", msgbuf) < 0)
- return FAIL_SEND;
-
- /* wait for the auth challenge */
- if (!smtp_read_response(inblock, (uschar *)buffer, buffsize, '3', timeout))
- return FAIL;
-
- /* convert the challenge into the challenge struct */
- DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: challenge (%s)\n\n",
- ablock->name, buffer + 4);
- spa_base64_to_bits ((char *)(&challenge), sizeof(challenge), (const char *)(buffer + 4));
-
- spa_build_auth_response (&challenge, &response,
- CS username, CS password);
- spa_bits_to_base64 (US msgbuf, (unsigned char*)&response,
- spa_request_length(&response));
- DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: challenge response (%s)\n\n", ablock->name,
- msgbuf);
-
- /* send the challenge response */
- if (smtp_write_command(outblock, FALSE, "%s\r\n", msgbuf) < 0)
- return FAIL_SEND;
-
- /* If we receive a success response from the server, authentication
- has succeeded. There may be more data to send, but is there any point
- in provoking an error here? */
- if (smtp_read_response(inblock, US buffer, buffsize, '2', timeout))
- return OK;
-
- /* Not a success response. If errno != 0 there is some kind of transmission
- error. Otherwise, check the response code in the buffer. If it starts with
- '3', more data is expected. */
- if (errno != 0 || buffer[0] != '3')
- return FAIL;
-
- return FAIL;
+auth_spa_options_block *ob =
+ (auth_spa_options_block *)(ablock->options_block);
+SPAAuthRequest request;
+SPAAuthChallenge challenge;
+SPAAuthResponse response;
+char msgbuf[2048];
+char *domain = NULL;
+char *username, *password;
+
+/* Code added by PH to expand the options */
+
+*buffer = 0; /* Default no message when cancelled */
+
+if (!(username = CS expand_string(ob->spa_username)))
+ {
+ if (f.expand_string_forcedfail) return CANCELLED;
+ string_format(buffer, buffsize, "expansion of \"%s\" failed in %s "
+ "authenticator: %s", ob->spa_username, ablock->name,
+ expand_string_message);
+ return ERROR;
+ }
+
+if (!(password = CS expand_string(ob->spa_password)))
+ {
+ if (f.expand_string_forcedfail) return CANCELLED;
+ string_format(buffer, buffsize, "expansion of \"%s\" failed in %s "
+ "authenticator: %s", ob->spa_password, ablock->name,
+ expand_string_message);
+ return ERROR;
+ }
+
+if (ob->spa_domain)
+ if (!(domain = CS expand_string(ob->spa_domain)))
+ {
+ if (f.expand_string_forcedfail) return CANCELLED;
+ string_format(buffer, buffsize, "expansion of \"%s\" failed in %s "
+ "authenticator: %s", ob->spa_domain, ablock->name,
+ expand_string_message);
+ return ERROR;
+ }
+
+/* Original code */
+
+if (smtp_write_command(sx, SCMD_FLUSH, "AUTH %s\r\n", ablock->public_name) < 0)
+ return FAIL_SEND;
+
+/* wait for the 3XX OK message */
+if (!smtp_read_response(sx, US buffer, buffsize, '3', timeout))
+ return FAIL;
+
+DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: using domain %s\n\n", ablock->name, domain);
+
+spa_build_auth_request (&request, CS username, domain);
+spa_bits_to_base64 (US msgbuf, (unsigned char*)&request,
+ spa_request_length(&request));
+
+DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: sending request (%s)\n\n", ablock->name, msgbuf);
+
+/* send the encrypted password */
+if (smtp_write_command(sx, SCMD_FLUSH, "%s\r\n", msgbuf) < 0)
+ return FAIL_SEND;
+
+/* wait for the auth challenge */
+if (!smtp_read_response(sx, US buffer, buffsize, '3', timeout))
+ return FAIL;
+
+/* convert the challenge into the challenge struct */
+DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: challenge (%s)\n\n", ablock->name, buffer + 4);
+spa_base64_to_bits (CS (&challenge), sizeof(challenge), CCS (buffer + 4));
+
+spa_build_auth_response (&challenge, &response, CS username, CS password);
+spa_bits_to_base64 (US msgbuf, (unsigned char*)&response,
+ spa_request_length(&response));
+DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: challenge response (%s)\n\n", ablock->name, msgbuf);
+
+/* send the challenge response */
+if (smtp_write_command(sx, SCMD_FLUSH, "%s\r\n", msgbuf) < 0)
+ return FAIL_SEND;
+
+/* If we receive a success response from the server, authentication
+has succeeded. There may be more data to send, but is there any point
+in provoking an error here? */
+
+if (smtp_read_response(sx, US buffer, buffsize, '2', timeout))
+ return OK;
+
+/* Not a success response. If errno != 0 there is some kind of transmission
+error. Otherwise, check the response code in the buffer. If it starts with
+'3', more data is expected. */
+
+if (errno != 0 || buffer[0] != '3')
+ return FAIL;
+
+return FAIL;
}
+#endif /*!MACRO_PREDEF*/
/* End of spa.c */
git://git.exim.org / users / jgh / exim.git / blobdiff