package controlled locations (/usr/include and /usr/lib).
-2. Use the following global settings to configure DMARC:
+2. Use the following global options to configure DMARC:
Required:
dmarc_tld_file Defines the location of a text file of valid
the most current version can be downloaded
from a link at http://publicsuffix.org/list/.
See also util/renew-opendmarc-tlds.sh script.
+ The default for the option is currently
+ /etc/exim/opendmarc.tlds
Optional:
dmarc_history_file Defines the location of a file to log results
directory of this file is writable by the user
exim runs as.
-dmarc_forensic_sender The email address to use when sending a
+dmarc_forensic_sender Alternate email address to use when sending a
forensic report detailing alignment failures
if a sender domain's dmarc record specifies it
and you have configured Exim to send them.
- Default: do-not-reply@$default_hostname
+
+ If set, this is expanded and used for the
+ From: header line; the address is extracted
+ from it and used for the envelope from.
+ If not set, the From: header is expanded from
+ the dsn_from option, and <> is used for the
+ envelope from.
+
+ Default: unset.
3. By default, the DMARC processing will run for any remote,
The spool files can then be processed by external processes and then
requeued into exim spool directories for final delivery.
+However, note carefully the warnings in the main documentation on
+qpool file formats.
The motivation/inspiration for the transport is to allow external
processes to access email queued by exim and have access to all the
Note that it would be wise to strip incoming messages of A-R headers
that claim to be from our own <admd-identifier>.
-There are three new variables: $arc_state, $arc_state_reason, $arc_domains:
+There are four new variables:
$arc_state One of pass, fail, none
$arc_state_reason (if fail, why)
an ARC set of headers. The textually-first Authentication-Results: header
is used as a basis (you must have added one on entry to the ADMD).
Expanded as a whole; if unset, empty or forced-failure then no signing is done.
-If it is set, all three elements must be non-empty.
+If it is set, all of the first three elements must be non-empty.
The fourth element is optional, and if present consists of a comma-separated list
of options. The options implemented are
* There must be an Authentication-Results header, presumably added by an ACL
while receiving the message, for the same ADMD, for arc_sign to succeed.
This requires careful coordination between inbound and outbound logic.
+
+ Only one A-R header is taken account of. This is a limitation versus
+ the ARC spec (which says that all A-R headers from within the ADMD must
+ be used).
+
* If passing a message to another system, such as a mailing-list manager
(MLM), between receipt and sending, be wary of manipulations to headers made
by the MLM.
+ For instance, Mailman with REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS==3 might improve
deliverability in a pre-ARC world, but that option also renames the
Authentication-Results header, which breaks signing.
+
* Even if you use multiple DKIM keys for different domains, the ARC concept
should try to stick to one ADMD, so pick a primary domain and use that for
AR headers and outbound signing.
+
+Early pipelining support
+------------------------
+Ref: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-harris-early-pipe/
+
+If compiled with EXPERIMENTAL_PIPE_CONNECT support is included for this feature.
+The server advertises the feature in its EHLO response, currently using the name
+"X_PIPE_CONNECT" (this will change, some time in the future).
+A client may cache this information, along with the rest of the EHLO response,
+and use it for later connections. Those later ones can send esmtp commands before
+a banner is received.
+
+Up to 1.5 roundtrip times can be taken out of cleartext connections, 2.5 on
+STARTTLS connections.
+
+In combination with the traditional PIPELINING feature the following example
+sequences are possible (among others):
+
+(client) (server)
+
+EHLO,MAIL,RCPT,DATA ->
+ <- banner,EHLO-resp,MAIL-ack,RCPT-ack,DATA-goahead
+message-data ->
+------
+
+EHLO,MAIL,RCPT,BDAT ->
+ <- banner,EHLO-resp,MAIL-ack,RCPT-ack
+message-data ->
+------
+
+EHLO,STARTTLS ->
+ <- banner,EHLO-resp,TLS-goahead
+TLS1.2-client-hello ->
+ <- TLS-server-hello,cert,hello-done
+client-Kex,change-cipher,finished ->
+ <- change-cipher,finished
+EHLO,MAIL,RCPT,DATA ->
+ <- EHLO-resp,MAIL-ack,RCPT-ack,DATA-goahead
+
+------
+(tls-on-connect)
+TLS1.2-client-hello ->
+ <- TLS-server-hello,cert,hello-done
+client-Kex,change-cipher,finished ->
+ <- change-cipher,finshed
+ <- banner
+EHLO,MAIL,RCPT,DATA ->
+ <- EHLO-resp,MAIL-ack,RCPT-ack,DATA-goahead
+
+Where the initial client packet is SMTP, it can combine with the TCP Fast Open
+feature and be sent in the TCP SYN.
+
+
+A main-section option "pipelining_connect_advertise_hosts" (default: *)
+and an smtp transport option "hosts_pipe_connect" (default: unset)
+control the feature.
+
+If the "pipelining" log_selector is enabled, the "L" field in server <=
+log lines has a period appended if the feature was advertised but not used;
+or has an asterisk appended if the feature was used. In client => lines
+the "L" field has an asterisk appended if the feature was used.
+
+The "retry_data_expire" option controls cache invalidation.
+Entries are also rewritten (or cleared) if the adverised features
+change.
+
+
+NOTE: since the EHLO command must be constructed before the connection is
+made it cannot depend on the interface IP address that will be used.
+Transport configurations should be checked for this. An example avoidance:
+
+ helo_data = ${if def:sending_ip_address \
+ {${lookup dnsdb{>! ptr=$sending_ip_address} \
+ {${sg{$value} {^([^!]*).*\$} {\$1}}} fail}} \
+ {$primary_hostname}}
+
+
+
+
+TLS Session Resumption
+----------------------
+TLS Session Resumption for TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 connections can be used (defined
+in RFC 5077 for 1.2). The support for this can be included by building with
+EXPERIMENTAL_TLS_RESUME defined. This requires GnuTLS 3.6.3 or OpenSSL 1.1.1
+(or later).
+
+Session resumption (this is the "stateless" variant) involves the server sending
+a "session ticket" to the client on one connection, which can be stored by the
+client and used for a later session. The ticket contains sufficient state for
+the server to reconstruct the TLS session, avoiding some expensive crypto
+calculation and one full packet roundtrip time.
+
+Operational cost/benefit:
+ The extra data being transmitted costs a minor amount, and the client has
+extra costs in storing and retrieving the data.
+
+In the Exim/Gnutls implementation the extra cost on an initial connection
+which is TLS1.2 over a loopback path is about 6ms on 2017-laptop class hardware.
+The saved cost on a subsequent connection is about 4ms; three or more
+connections become a net win. On longer network paths, two or more
+connections will have an average lower startup time thanks to the one
+saved packet roundtrip. TLS1.3 will save the crypto cpu costs but not any
+packet roundtrips.
+
+Security aspects:
+ The session ticket is encrypted, but is obviously an additional security
+vulnarability surface. An attacker able to decrypt it would have access
+all connections using the resumed session.
+The session ticket encryption key is not committed to storage by the server
+and is rotated regularly. Tickets have limited lifetime.
+
+There is a question-mark over the security of the Diffie-Helman parameters
+used for session negotiation. TBD. q-value; cf bug 1895
+
+Observability:
+ New log_selector "tls_resumption", appends an asterisk to the tls_cipher "X="
+element.
+
+Variables $tls_{in,out}_resumption have bit 0-4 indicating respectively
+support built, client requested ticket, client offered session,
+server issued ticket, resume used. A suitable decode list is provided
+in the builtin macro _RESUME_DECODE for ${listextract {}{}}.
+
+
--------------------------------------------------------------
End of file
--------------------------------------------------------------
git://git.exim.org / users / jgh / exim.git / blobdiff