Another bug in autoreply with bad address.

[users/jgh/exim.git] / doc / doc-txt / ChangeLog

diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
index 3d504e0de7c15a1724f99f73145dbe5db478f365..7122575dff498e4e572ccf6fb522664438b25021 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.278 2005/12/15 17:58:23 jetmore Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.280 2005/12/19 12:25:21 ph10 Exp $
 
 Change log file for Exim from version 4.21
 -------------------------------------------
@@ -52,6 +52,14 @@ JJ/01 exipick: fixed bug where -b (brief) output option showed "Vars:"
 JJ/02 exipick: Added support for new ACL variable spool format introduced
       in 4.61-PH/06
 
+PH/10 Fixed another bug related to PH/04 above: if an incoming message had a
+      syntactically invalid From: or Reply-to: line, and a filter used this to
+      generate an autoreply, and therefore failed to obtain an address for the
+      autoreply, Exim could try to deliver to a non-existent relative file
+      name, causing unrelated and misleading errors. What now happens is that
+      it logs this as a hard delivery error, but does not attempt to create a
+      bounce message.
+
 
 Exim version 4.60
 -----------------
@@ -244,9 +252,6 @@ TF/01 The control=submission/name=... option had a problem with syntax
 PH/05 Some modifications to the interface to the fake nameserver for the new
       testing suite.
 
-PH/06 Add ${if def:sender_address {(envelope-from <$sender_address>)\n\t}}
-      into the default Received: header string.
-
 
 
 Exim version 4.53