Exim crashed for a huge SMTP error response; increasing big_buffer_size

[users/jgh/exim.git] / doc / doc-misc / WishList

diff --git a/doc/doc-misc/WishList b/doc/doc-misc/WishList
index 110edb613718d16a9a54e91ba6be0ea2fc074186..1704cdbb32283957387a0d50de49c340a8f26c46 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/doc-misc/WishList
+++ b/doc/doc-misc/WishList
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.12 2004/12/01 14:33:21 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.15 2004/12/17 14:52:43 ph10 Exp $
 
 EXIM 4 WISH LIST
 ----------------
@@ -880,6 +880,11 @@ cleanly.
 
 22-Apr-04: Implemented for domains, addresses, and local parts. Hosts are
 too messy!
+
+The only sensible approach seems to be to allow IP address arguments only.
+Anything else should be diagnosed as an error. However, if a name appears in
+the list, a PTR lookup should be done. This may require a lot of refactoring
+in the code.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 (74)  22-Jul-02 M  Extend -bV to do more semantic checking
@@ -1812,5 +1817,26 @@ If a queue-runner opened the -D file and took out the lock before forking, it
 would waste fewer resources if the message was already being delivered. But how
 often would this actually matter in practice?
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- HWM 309 ------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+(310) 06-Dec-04 S After "personal" save what matched
+
+The idea is to save the email address that actually was found in the message
+in a variable so it can be used (e.g. as the From: address in an autoreply).
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+(311) 07-Dec-04 ? More flexible SMTP response codes
+
+The requestor wanted to be able to specify, for example, 551 in an ACL deny
+instead of 550, and also vary the defer code. The first digit, however, should
+remain fixed. In addition to main codes, enhanced status codes (RFC 2034) were
+requested. (As far as I can tell, they have never been highly popular.)
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+(312) 10-Dec-04 ? Shadow remote transports
+
+Unless a lot of work is done, this would be restricted to another remote
+transport. A similar effect could therefore be achieved with "shadow_hosts"
+which are like fallback_hosts but which operate on success.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- HWM 312 ------------------------------------------------------------------
 ---------------------------- End of WishList ---------------------------------