Log lines flagged for both main and reject logs were not written to

[users/jgh/exim.git] / doc / doc-docbook / Markup.txt

diff --git a/doc/doc-docbook/Markup.txt b/doc/doc-docbook/Markup.txt
index 9220eb4e84cf1b0d094a78b00ce2cfb46f8a5365..f81876508a84c601bc64178f720201b3ed1ca956 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/doc-docbook/Markup.txt
+++ b/doc/doc-docbook/Markup.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-docbook/Markup.txt,v 1.1 2006/02/01 11:01:01 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-docbook/Markup.txt,v 1.2 2006/04/04 14:03:49 ph10 Exp $

 
 XFPT MARKUP USED IN THE EXIM DOCUMENTATION
 ------------------------------------------
 
 XFPT MARKUP USED IN THE EXIM DOCUMENTATION
 ------------------------------------------


@@ -217,8 +217,16 @@ To create an index entry, include a line like one of these:
   .oindex "primary text" "secondary text"
 
 The first is for the "concept index" and the second is for the "options index".
   .oindex "primary text" "secondary text"
 
 The first is for the "concept index" and the second is for the "options index".

-Not all forms of output distinguish between these - sometimes there is just one
-index.
+The secondary text is of course optional. Not all forms of output distinguish
+between these - sometimes there is just one index. For the concept index, it is
+also possible to set "start" and "end" markers so that the entry lists a range
+of pages. This is how to do that:
+
+  .scindex IID "primary text" "secondary text"
+  <intervening text, should be several pages>
+  .ecindex IID
+
+The IID must be some unique string to tie the entries together.

 
 The index for the Exim reference manual has a number of "see also" entries.
 These are coded in raw XML at the start of the source file.
 
 The index for the Exim reference manual has a number of "see also" entries.
 These are coded in raw XML at the start of the source file.


@@ -351,4 +359,4 @@ Each such entry must be separately marked. If there are more than one or two,
 it may be easier just to mark the entire table.
 
 Philip Hazel
 it may be easier just to mark the entire table.
 
 Philip Hazel

-Last updated: 25 January 2006
+Last updated: 30 March 2006