error = error; /* Keep clever compilers from complaining */
-if (valueptr != NULL) *valueptr = NULL; /* For non-lookup matches */
+if (valueptr) *valueptr = NULL;
/* For regular expressions, use cb->origsubject rather than cb->subject so that
it works if the pattern uses (?-i) to turn off case-independence, overriding
: !regex_match_and_setup(re, s, 0, expand_setup)
)
return FAIL;
- /* assume the above wrote $0, $n... TODO: CHECK THAT !! */
if (valueptr) *valueptr = pattern; /* "value" gets the RE */
return OK;
}
{
expand_nstring[++expand_setup] = s; /* write a $n, the matched subject variable-part */
expand_nlength[expand_setup] = slen - patlen;
- expand_nmax = expand_setup;
+ expand_nmax = expand_setup; /* commit also $0, the matched subject */
}
- if (valueptr) *valueptr = pattern; /* "value" gets the pattern */
+ if (valueptr) *valueptr = pattern - 1; /* "value" gets the (original) pattern */
return OK;
}
if (Ustrncmp(ip->address, s+1, slen - 2) == 0
&& ip->address[slen - 2] == 0)
{
-/* I see no reason not to return $0, the matchd IP. if (expand_setup >= 0) expand_nmax = expand_setup; */
+ if (expand_setup >= 0) expand_nmax = expand_setup; /* commit $0, the IP addr */
if (valueptr) *valueptr = pattern; /* "value" gets the pattern */
return OK;
}
return DEFER;
}
- if (rc != HOST_FOUND_LOCAL || secy)
- if (prim || !removed) return FAIL;
+ if ((rc != HOST_FOUND_LOCAL || secy) && (prim || !removed))
+ return FAIL;
-/* again, $0 getting the subject, the matched IP. if (expand_setup >= 0) expand_nmax = expand_setup; */
- if (valueptr) *valueptr = pattern; /* "vaulue" gets the patterm */
+ if (expand_setup >= 0) expand_nmax = expand_setup; /* commit $0, the matched subject */
+ if (valueptr) *valueptr = pattern; /* "value" gets the patterm */
return OK;
/*** The above line used to be the following line, but this is incorrect,
if (expand_setup >= 0) expand_nmax = expand_setup; /* Original code! $0 gets the matched subject */
if (valueptr) *valueptr = pattern; /* "value" gets the pattern */
return OK;
-
-/*
-XXX looks like $0 may be usable
-XXX could add setting of *valueptr to all the OK returns; seems doable here, the Q
- is: what effect would it have at config-file level. domain_data & local_part_data
- would get filled in... might anyone be checking it for emptiness? I think the docs
- do not say "will be empty otherwise", so that seems ok.
-XXX WORRY: we get new caching of named-list match results. Is that cache checked
- for the key being matched?
-*/
}
/* Otherwise we have a lookup item. The lookup type, including partial, etc. is
{
check_string_block cb;
cb.origsubject = s;
-cb.subject = caseless? string_copylc(s) : string_copy(s);
+cb.subject = caseless ? string_copylc(s) : string_copy(s);
cb.expand_setup = expand_setup;
cb.use_partial = use_partial;
cb.caseless = caseless;
nb->cache_data = p;
if (*valueptr)
DEBUG(D_lists) debug_printf("data from lookup saved for "
- "cache for %s: %s\n", ss, *valueptr);
+ "cache for %s: key '%s' value '%s'\n", ss, p->key, *valueptr);
}
}
}
else
{
DEBUG(D_lists) debug_printf("cached %s match for %s\n",
- ((bits & (-bits)) == bits)? "yes" : "no", ss);
+ (bits & (-bits)) == bits ? "yes" : "no", ss);
cached = US" - cached";
if (valueptr)
unsigned int *local_cache_bits = cache_bits;
check_string_block cb;
cb.origsubject = s;
-cb.subject = caseless? string_copylc(s) : string_copy(s);
-cb.expand_setup = (sep > UCHAR_MAX)? 0 : -1;
+cb.subject = caseless ? string_copylc(s) : string_copy(s);
+cb.at_is_special = FALSE;
+switch (type & ~MCL_NOEXPAND)
+ {
+ case MCL_DOMAIN: cb.at_is_special = TRUE; /*FALLTHROUGH*/
+ case MCL_LOCALPART: cb.expand_setup = 0; break;
+ default: cb.expand_setup = sep > UCHAR_MAX ? 0 : -1; break;
+ }
cb.use_partial = TRUE;
cb.caseless = caseless;
-cb.at_is_special = (type == MCL_DOMAIN || type == MCL_DOMAIN + MCL_NOEXPAND);
-if (valueptr != NULL) *valueptr = NULL;
+if (valueptr) *valueptr = NULL;
return match_check_list(listptr, sep, anchorptr, &local_cache_bits,
check_string, &cb, type, s, valueptr);
}