-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.25 2005/03/15 15:36:41 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-misc/WishList,v 1.28 2005/04/04 08:27:28 ph10 Exp $
EXIM 4 WISH LIST
----------------
particular, it would allow failing of certain 4xx codes.
This is now available for 4xx responses to RCPT commands. Is anything more
-needed?
+needed? Apparently, yes; there's been a request for a similar feature for MAIL
+commands.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(148) 15-May-2000 S Warn recipient if message rejected for quota excession.
AUTH during the callout checking, on all types of connection. I suppose that
means making TLS available as well. This probably means a rewrite of the code
that actually does the callout. Should we use the relevant transport in a new
-"callout" mode instead of keeping things separate? See also 253.
+"callout" mode instead of keeping things separate? See also 253 and 323.
And here's another submitted idea: "My actual suggestion is that if this model
is followed, the parent process doesn't have to stop the callout process if it
(322) 15-Mar-05 M Add a /defer_ok option to verify=reverse_host_lookup
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---- HWM 322 ------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+(323) 15-Mar-05 M Make callouts use smtp_data from the smtp transport
+
+This is yet another problem caused by duplicating the SMTP code between the
+transport and the callout verification. See item 294 above. Merging the
+transport and the callout code could prevent this kind of thing from happening.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+(324) 04-Apr-05 ? Make -bP show ACLs
+
+This is in the Bugzilla as #10.
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+--- HWM 324 ------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------- End of WishList ---------------------------------