SPF: handle DNS NO_DATA return. Bug 2499

[users/jgh/exim.git] / test / scripts / 4600-SPF / 4601

diff --git a/test/scripts/4600-SPF/4601 b/test/scripts/4600-SPF/4601
index ab434611c962e52de987495434baf1dea9c440ec..96f06a6d12fa2a7807399f148d70bc0178a15632 100644 (file)
--- a/test/scripts/4600-SPF/4601
+++ b/test/scripts/4600-SPF/4601
@@ -1,12 +1,5 @@
 # lookup string-expansion
 #
-# It is rather difficult to properly test spf.  We use libspf2 to do the work, and it
-# does the DNS lookups, so we cannot intercept them in the testsuite's usual fashion
-# to provide values for testcases.
-#
-# For now just check that what should be working syntax does not cause us to fall over.
-# Be careful with envelope-domains used for testcases, as real DNS lookups will be done.
-#
 exim -bd -DSERVER=server -oX PORT_D:PORT_S
 ****
 client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D
@@ -31,3 +24,15 @@ quit
 ****
 #
 killdaemon
+#
+# SERVFAIL -> temperror
+# A multiple spf-RR return should get permerror
+# - and not crash with non-spf txt records
+# v=spf1 is casr-insensitive
+exim -be
+none      ${lookup {fred@v6.test.ex} spf {HOSTIPV4}}
+temperror ${lookup {fred@test.again.dns} spf {HOSTIPV4}}
+permerror ${lookup {fred@double.example.com} spf {8.8.8.8}}
+permerror ${lookup {fred@doubleplus.example.com} spf {8.8.8.8}}
+pass      ${lookup {fred@uppercase.example.com} spf {HOSTIPV4}}
+****