Releases signed by Phil's key, not Nigel's.

[users/heiko/exim.git] / doc / doc-docbook / spec.xfpt

diff --git a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
index 7d8080b9dd2de36822e41b709e2395fa7c4095b5..d35c305c8ad1898c2243049a3301f3d010960cf3 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
+++ b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
@@ -533,10 +533,23 @@ The &_.bz2_& file is usually a lot smaller than the &_.gz_& file.
 .cindex "distribution" "signing details"
 .cindex "distribution" "public key"
 .cindex "public key for signed distribution"
-The distributions are currently signed with Nigel Metheringham's GPG key. The
-corresponding public key is available from a number of keyservers, and there is
-also a copy in the file &_nigel-pubkey.asc_&. The signatures for the tar bundles are
-in:
+.new
+The distributions will be PGP signed by an individual key of the Release
+Coordinator.  This key will have a uid containing an email address in the
+&'exim.org'& domain and will have signatures from other people, including
+other Exim maintainers.  We expect that the key will be in the "strong set" of
+PGP keys.  There should be a trust path to that key from Nigel Metheringham's
+PGP key, a version of which can be found in the release directory in the file
+&_nigel-pubkey.asc_&.  All keys used will be available in public keyserver pools,
+such as &'pool.sks-keyservers.net'&.
+
+At time of last update, releases were being made by Phil Pennock and signed with
+key &'0x403043153903637F'&, although that key is expected to be replaced in 2013.
+A trust path from Nigel's key to Phil's can be observed at
+&url(https://www.security.spodhuis.org/exim-trustpath).
+.wen
+
+The signatures for the tar bundles are in:
 .display
 &_exim-n.nn.tar.gz.asc_&
 &_exim-n.nn.tar.bz2.asc_&
@@ -1348,6 +1361,8 @@ Setting the &%verify%& option actually sets two options, &%verify_sender%& and
 &%verify_recipient%&, which independently control the use of the router for
 sender and recipient verification. You can set these options directly if
 you want a router to be used for only one type of verification.
+Note that cutthrough delivery is classed as a recipient verification
+for this purpose.
 .next
 If the &%address_test%& option is set false, the router is skipped when Exim is
 run with the &%-bt%& option to test an address routing. This can be helpful
@@ -1357,6 +1372,7 @@ having to simulate the effect of the scanner.
 .next
 Routers can be designated for use only when verifying an address, as
 opposed to routing it for delivery. The &%verify_only%& option controls this.
+Again, cutthrough delibery counts as a verification.
 .next
 Individual routers can be explicitly skipped when running the routers to
 check an address given in the SMTP EXPN command (see the &%expn%& option).
@@ -17225,7 +17241,8 @@ Setting this option has the effect of setting &%verify_sender%& and
 .cindex "EXPN" "with &%verify_only%&"
 .oindex "&%-bv%&"
 .cindex "router" "used only when verifying"
-If this option is set, the router is used only when verifying an address or
+If this option is set, the router is used only when verifying an address,
+delivering in cutthrough mode or
 testing with the &%-bv%& option, not when actually doing a delivery, testing
 with the &%-bt%& option, or running the SMTP EXPN command. It can be further
 restricted to verifying only senders or recipients by means of
@@ -17239,7 +17256,8 @@ user or group.
 
 .option verify_recipient routers&!? boolean true
 If this option is false, the router is skipped when verifying recipient
-addresses
+addresses,
+delivering in cutthrough mode
 or testing recipient verification using &%-bv%&.
 See section &<<SECTrouprecon>>& for a list of the order in which preconditions
 are evaluated.
@@ -27035,7 +27053,7 @@ This option requests delivery be attempted while the item is being received.
 It is usable in the RCPT ACL and valid only for single-recipient mails forwarded
 from one SMTP connection to another.  If a recipient-verify callout connection is
 requested in the same ACL it is held open and used for the data, otherwise one is made
-after the ACL completes.
+after the ACL completes.  Note that routers are used in verify mode.
 
 Should the ultimate destination system positively accept or reject the mail,
 a corresponding indication is given to the source system and nothing is queued.