Copyright year updates: 2014

[users/heiko/exim.git] / doc / doc-docbook / spec.xfpt

diff --git a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
index 0ed811ab5e1cfab5040d447ad9c7c233e21eb26e..edb577a11e51716ef0b280e9d7acff6361ba3624 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
+++ b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 .set I   "    "
 
 .macro copyyear
 .set I   "    "
 
 .macro copyyear

-2013
+2014

 .endmacro
 
 . /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 .endmacro
 
 . /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////


@@ -27292,7 +27292,12 @@ It is usable in the RCPT ACL and valid only for single-recipient mails forwarded
 from one SMTP connection to another.  If a recipient-verify callout connection is
 requested in the same ACL it is held open and used for the data, otherwise one is made
 after the ACL completes.
 from one SMTP connection to another.  If a recipient-verify callout connection is
 requested in the same ACL it is held open and used for the data, otherwise one is made
 after the ACL completes.

-Note that routers are used in verify mode.
+
+Note that routers are used in verify mode.  Note also that headers cannot be
+modified by any of the post-data ACLs (DATA, MIME and DKIM).
+Cutthrough delivery is not supported via transport-filters or when DKIM signing
+of outgoing messages is done, because it sends data to the ultimate destination
+before the entire message has been received from the source.

 
 Should the ultimate destination system positively accept or reject the mail,
 a corresponding indication is given to the source system and nothing is queued.
 
 Should the ultimate destination system positively accept or reject the mail,
 a corresponding indication is given to the source system and nothing is queued.


@@ -27303,7 +27308,6 @@ line.
 
 Delivery in this mode avoids the generation of a bounce mail to a (possibly faked)
 sender when the destination system is doing content-scan based rejection.
 
 Delivery in this mode avoids the generation of a bounce mail to a (possibly faked)
 sender when the destination system is doing content-scan based rejection.

-Cutthrough delivery is not supported via transport-filters.

 
 
 .vitem &*control&~=&~debug/*&<&'options'&>
 
 
 .vitem &*control&~=&~debug/*&<&'options'&>


@@ -27547,12 +27551,15 @@ warn dnslists = sbl.spamhaus.org : \
      add_header = X-blacklisted-at: $dnslist_domain
 .endd
 The &%add_header%& modifier is permitted in the MAIL, RCPT, PREDATA, DATA,
      add_header = X-blacklisted-at: $dnslist_domain
 .endd
 The &%add_header%& modifier is permitted in the MAIL, RCPT, PREDATA, DATA,

-MIME, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with
+MIME, DKIM, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with

 receiving a message). The message must ultimately be accepted for
 &%add_header%& to have any significant effect. You can use &%add_header%& with
 any ACL verb, including &%deny%& (though this is potentially useful only in a
 RCPT ACL).
 
 receiving a message). The message must ultimately be accepted for
 &%add_header%& to have any significant effect. You can use &%add_header%& with
 any ACL verb, including &%deny%& (though this is potentially useful only in a
 RCPT ACL).
 

+Headers will not be added to the message if the modifier is used in
+DATA, MIME or DKIM ACLs for messages delivered by cutthrough routing.
+

 Leading and trailing newlines are removed from
 the data for the &%add_header%& modifier; if it then
 contains one or more newlines that
 Leading and trailing newlines are removed from
 the data for the &%add_header%& modifier; if it then
 contains one or more newlines that


@@ -27646,12 +27653,15 @@ warn   message        = Remove internal headers
        remove_header  = x-route-mail1 : x-route-mail2
 .endd
 The &%remove_header%& modifier is permitted in the MAIL, RCPT, PREDATA, DATA,
        remove_header  = x-route-mail1 : x-route-mail2
 .endd
 The &%remove_header%& modifier is permitted in the MAIL, RCPT, PREDATA, DATA,

-MIME, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with
+MIME, DKIM, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with

 receiving a message). The message must ultimately be accepted for
 &%remove_header%& to have any significant effect. You can use &%remove_header%&
 with any ACL verb, including &%deny%&, though this is really not useful for
 any verb that doesn't result in a delivered message.
 
 receiving a message). The message must ultimately be accepted for
 &%remove_header%& to have any significant effect. You can use &%remove_header%&
 with any ACL verb, including &%deny%&, though this is really not useful for
 any verb that doesn't result in a delivered message.
 

+Headers will not be removed to the message if the modifier is used in
+DATA, MIME or DKIM ACLs for messages delivered by cutthrough routing.
+

 More than one header can be removed at the same time by using a colon separated
 list of header names. The header matching is case insensitive. Wildcards are
 not permitted, nor is list expansion performed, so you cannot use hostlists to
 More than one header can be removed at the same time by using a colon separated
 list of header names. The header matching is case insensitive. Wildcards are
 not permitted, nor is list expansion performed, so you cannot use hostlists to


@@ -36339,7 +36349,9 @@ disabled by setting DISABLE_DKIM=yes in Local/Makefile.
 Exim's DKIM implementation allows to
 .olist
 Sign outgoing messages: This function is implemented in the SMTP transport.
 Exim's DKIM implementation allows to
 .olist
 Sign outgoing messages: This function is implemented in the SMTP transport.

-It can co-exist with all other Exim features, including transport filters.
+It can co-exist with all other Exim features
+(including transport filters)
+except cutthrough delivery.

 .next
 Verify signatures in incoming messages: This is implemented by an additional
 ACL (acl_smtp_dkim), which can be called several times per message, with
 .next
 Verify signatures in incoming messages: This is implemented by an additional
 ACL (acl_smtp_dkim), which can be called several times per message, with


@@ -36430,6 +36442,10 @@ used.
 Verification of DKIM signatures in incoming email is implemented via the
 &%acl_smtp_dkim%& ACL. By default, this ACL is called once for each
 syntactically(!) correct signature in the incoming message.
 Verification of DKIM signatures in incoming email is implemented via the
 &%acl_smtp_dkim%& ACL. By default, this ACL is called once for each
 syntactically(!) correct signature in the incoming message.

+A missing ACL definition defaults to accept.
+If any ACL call does not acccept, the message is not accepted.
+If a cutthrough delivery was in progress for the message it is
+summarily dropped (having wasted the transmission effort).

 
 To evaluate the signature in the ACL a large number of expansion variables
 containing the signature status and its details are set up during the
 
 To evaluate the signature in the ACL a large number of expansion variables
 containing the signature status and its details are set up during the