TLS: use RFC 6125 rules for certifucate name checks when CNAMES are present....

[users/heiko/exim.git] / test / log / 4002

diff --git a/test/log/4002 b/test/log/4002
index 32535f5ace0f3ae2da75b1cab6c871a884e3604d..c1176fee61524eade4d4d5f9e51f02c3ce84c01b 100644 (file)
--- a/test/log/4002
+++ b/test/log/4002
@@ -1,17 +1,6 @@
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 U=fromuser Warning: [127.0.0.1]:1111 no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 <= fromuser@myhost.test.ex U=fromuser P=local-esmtp S=sss
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 <= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss id=41C2F849.3060203@projectile.test.ex
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 => userx <userx@test.ex> R=r1 T=t1
 1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 U=fromuser Warning: [127.0.0.1]:1111 no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 <= fromuser@myhost.test.ex U=fromuser P=local-esmtp S=sss
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 (= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss id=41C2F849.3060203@projectile.test.ex
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 => userx <userx@test.ex> R=r1 T=t1
 1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 U=fromuser Warning: [127.0.0.1]:1111 no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 <= fromuser@myhost.test.ex U=fromuser P=local-esmtp S=sss
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 spam acl condition: spamd: failed to connect to any address for ip4.ip4.ip4.ip4: Connection refused
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 U=fromuser Warning: [127.0.0.1]:1111 no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 <= fromuser@myhost.test.ex U=fromuser P=local-esmtp S=sss
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 Completed