Use random_number rather than random, for external server distribution. Bug 2694

[users/heiko/exim.git] / test / log / 4009

diff --git a/test/log/4009 b/test/log/4009
index 72d5e43ea6f3284f1a4dd12143f0b6cbf967be15..28cbd960eecbb92820b29ba6446cfa645e7b2253 100644 (file)
--- a/test/log/4009
+++ b/test/log/4009
@@ -1,17 +1,13 @@
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 U=CALLER Warning: no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 <= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 U=CALLER Warning: no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 <= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 U=CALLER Warning: no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 <= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 <= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss T="message should be accepted"
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 Completed
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 malware acl condition: sophie TESTSUITE/eximdir/sophie_sock : scanner reported error
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<CALLER@myhost.test.ex> temporarily rejected after DATA
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 malware_name VNAME
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<CALLER@myhost.test.ex> rejected after DATA
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 malware acl condition: sophie TESTSUITE/eximdir/sophie_sock : unable to read from UNIX socket (TESTSUITE/eximdir/sophie_sock)
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 U=CALLER F=<CALLER@myhost.test.ex> temporarily rejected after DATA
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 malware acl condition: sophie TESTSUITE/eximdir/sophie_sock : unable to read from UNIX socket (TESTSUITE/eximdir/sophie_sock)
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 <= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss T="message should be accepted destpite timeout"
 1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
 1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 spam acl condition: spamd: failed to connect to any address for 127.0.0.2: Connection refused
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 U=CALLER Warning: no action Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",\n has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original\n message has been attached to this so you can view it or label\n similar future email.  If you have any questions, see\n @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.\n \n Content preview:  test [...]\n \n Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)\n \n  pts rule name              description\n ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------\n -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP\n  1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header\n  1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header\n  1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header\n  1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header\n  0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 <= CALLER@myhost.test.ex U=CALLER P=local-esmtp S=sss
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 => :blackhole: <userx@test.ex> R=r
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 Completed