DANE: force SNI to use $domain. Bug 2265

[users/heiko/exim.git] / test / scripts / 4540-DKIM-Ed25519 / 4540

diff --git a/test/scripts/4540-DKIM-Ed25519/4540 b/test/scripts/4540-DKIM-Ed25519/4540
index 0be08ea31306b910804a99c49dab7e93617fa890..317385041bdbbb6d7c76c31850d393933cd5ce6f 100644 (file)
--- a/test/scripts/4540-DKIM-Ed25519/4540
+++ b/test/scripts/4540-DKIM-Ed25519/4540
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ exim -DSERVER=server -bd -oX PORT_D
 # This should pass, only Mail::DKIM::Signer does not handle ed25519-sha256 yet
 #
 # Mail original (will be)in aux-fixed/4500.msg1.txt
-# Sig generated by: perl aux-fixed/dkim/sign.pl --algorithm=ed255190sha256 \
+# Sig (would be) generated by: perl aux-fixed/dkim/sign.pl --algorithm=ed255190sha256 \
 #                      --method=simple/simple < aux-fixed/4500.msg1.txt
 #
 # TODO - until we have that we can only test internal consistency,
@@ -44,9 +44,42 @@ QUIT
 ****
 #
 #
+# Duplicate of the above, but referencing a pubkey in "wrapped-in-SubjectPublicKeyInfo"
+# format.  Should pass also.
+client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D
+??? 220
+HELO xxx
+??? 250
+MAIL FROM:<CALLER@bloggs.com>
+??? 250
+RCPT TO:<a@test.ex>
+??? 250
+DATA
+??? 354
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=test.ex
+ ; s=sedw; h=From:To:Subject; bh=/Ab0giHZitYQbDhFszoqQRUkgqueaX9zatJttIU/plc=;
+ b=g0aVl5sI4fFLWDwXj9SnLgENXg2u8H8kKgK5/bXBZ7DKAImkm2+4tRzz1UOveu/Navis53Bg/C
+ 9nPxsspzb/Dg==;
+Received: from jgh by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
+       envelope-from <jgh@myhost.test.ex>)
+        1dtXln-0000YP-Hb
+        a@test.ex; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100
+From: nobody@example.com
+Message-Id: <E1dtXln-0000YP-Hb@myhost.test.ex>
+Sender: CALLER_NAME <jgh@myhost.test.ex>
+Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100
+
+content
+.
+??? 250
+QUIT
+??? 221
+****
+#
+#
+
 # This should pass, an independently-generated sample from Scott Kitterman.
-# I don't want to retain this longterm as it hits an external DNS record,
-# not under the testsuite.
+# We use a copied version of his DNS record.
 client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D
 ??? 220
 HELO xxx
@@ -79,5 +112,46 @@ QUIT
 ****
 #
 killdaemon
+#
+#
+#
+#
+# This should fail because the signing pubkey is too small.
+exim -DSERVER=server -DMSIZE='rsa=1024 ed25519=300' -bd -oX PORT_D
+****
+#
+# Duplicate test input to the first one, above.
+#
+client 127.0.0.1 PORT_D
+??? 220
+HELO xxx
+??? 250
+MAIL FROM:<CALLER@bloggs.com>
+??? 250
+RCPT TO:<a@test.ex>
+??? 250
+DATA
+??? 354
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=test.ex
+       ; s=sed; h=From:To:Subject; bh=/Ab0giHZitYQbDhFszoqQRUkgqueaX9zatJttIU/plc=;
+        b=5fhyD3EILDrnL4DnkD4hDaeis7+GSzL9GMHrhIDZJjuJ00WD5iI8SQ1q9rDfzFL/Kdw0VIyB4R
+       Dq0a4H6HI+Bw==;
+Received: from jgh by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
+       envelope-from <jgh@myhost.test.ex>)
+        1dtXln-0000YP-Hb
+        a@test.ex; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100
+From: nobody@example.com
+Message-Id: <E1dtXln-0000YP-Hb@myhost.test.ex>
+Sender: CALLER_NAME <jgh@myhost.test.ex>
+Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 12:29:51 +0100
+
+content
+.
+??? 250
+QUIT
+??? 221
+****
+killdaemon
+#
 no_stdout_check
 no_msglog_check