# the older (comment) style, keeping only the Auth element
# (discarding kex, cipher, mac). For TLS 1.3 there is no kex
# element (and no _WITH); insert a spurious "RSA".
+ # Also in $tls_X_cipher_std reporting.
- s/^\s+by .+ with .+ \K tls TLS_.*?([^_]+)_WITH.+$/(TLS1.x:ke-$1-AES256-SHAnnn:xxx)/;
- s/^\s+by .+ with .+ \K tls TLS_.+$/(TLS1.x:ke-RSA-AES256-SHAnnn:xxx)/;
+ s/^\s+by \S+ with .+ \K \(TLS1(?:\.[0-3])?\) tls TLS_.*?([^_]+)_WITH.+$/(TLS1.x:ke-$1-AES256-SHAnnn:xxx)/;
+ s/^\s+by \S+ with .+ \K \(TLS1(?:\.[0-3])?\) tls TLS_.+$/(TLS1.x:ke-RSA-AES256-SHAnnn:xxx)/;
+
+ s/ cipher_ TLS_.*?([^_]+)_WITH.+$/ cipher_ TLS1.x:ke_$1_WITH_ci_mac/;
+ s/ cipher_ TLS_.*$/ cipher_ TLS1.x:ke_RSA_WITH_ci_mac/;
# Test machines might have various different TLS library versions supporting
# different protocols; can't rely upon TLS 1.2's AES256-GCM-SHA384, so we
# treat the standard algorithms the same.
#
- # TLSversion : KeyExchange? - Authentication/Signature - C_iph_er - MAC : ???
+ # TLSversion : KeyExchange? - Authentication/Signature - C_iph_er - MAC : bits
#
# So far, have seen:
# TLSv1:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128
#
# Retain the authentication algorith field as we want to test that.
- s/( (?: (?:\b|\s) [\(=] ) | \s )TLSv1(\.[123])?:/$1TLS1.x:/xg;
+ s/( (?: (?:\b|\s) [\(=] ) | \s )TLS1(\.[123])?:/$1TLS1.x:/xg;
s/(?<!ke-)((EC)?DHE-)?(RSA|ECDSA)-AES(128|256)-(GCM-SHA(256|384)|SHA)(?!:)/ke-$3-AES256-SHAnnn/g;
s/(?<!ke-)((EC)?DHE-)?(RSA|ECDSA)-AES(128|256)-(GCM-SHA(256|384)|SHA):(128|256)/ke-$3-AES256-SHAnnn:xxx/g;
# DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
# picking latter as canonical simply because regex easier that way.
s/\bDHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128/RSA-AES256-SHA1:256/g;
- s/TLS1.[0123](-PKIX)?: # TLS version
+ s/TLS1.[x0123](-PKIX)?: # TLS version
((EC)?DHE(_((?<psk>PSK)_)?((?<auth>RSA|ECDSA)_)?
(SECP(256|521)R1|X25519))?__?)? # key-exchange
((?<auth>RSA|ECDSA)((_PSS_RSAE)?_SHA(512|256))?__?)? # authentication
+ (?<with>WITH_)? # stdname-with
AES_(256|128)_(CBC|GCM) # cipher
(__?AEAD)? # pseudo-MAC
(__?SHA(1|256|384))? # PRF
/"TLS1.x:ke-"
. (defined($+{psk}) ? $+{psk} : "")
. (defined($+{auth}) ? $+{auth} : "")
+ . (defined($+{with}) ? $+{with} : "")
. "-AES256-SHAnnn:xxx"/gex;
s/TLS1.2:RSA__CAMELLIA_256_GCM(_SHA384)?:256/TLS1.2:RSA_CAMELLIA_256_GCM-SHAnnn:256/g;
s/\b(ECDHE-(RSA|ECDSA)-AES256-SHA|DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256)\b/ke-$2-AES256-SHAnnn/g;
+ # Separate reporting of TLS version
+ s/ver: TLS1(\.[0-3])?$/ver: TLS1.x/;
+ s/ \(TLS1(\.[0-3])?\) / (TLS1.x) /;
+
# GnuTLS library error message changes
s/(No certificate was found|Certificate is required)/The peer did not send any certificate/g;
#(dodgy test?) s/\(certificate verification failed\): invalid/\(gnutls_handshake\): The peer did not send any certificate./g;
s! DN="[^,"]*\K,!/!;
',
'rejectlog' => 's/ X=TLS\S+ / X=TLS_proto_and_cipher /',
- 'mail' => 's/^\s+by .+ with .+ \K tls TLS_.+$/(TLS_proto_and_cipher)/;
- s/ \(TLS[^)]*\)/ (TLS_proto_and_cipher)/;
- ',
},
'debug_pid' =>
# version, which matches the munging that is done later
# Why? We must ensure sure, that 127.0.0.1 always sorts first
# map-sort-map: Schwartz's transformation
+ # test 0099
my @temp = map { $_->[1] }
sort { $a->[0] cmp $b->[0] }
- map { [ (split)[0] =~ s/\Q$parm_ipv4/ip4.ip4.ip4.ip4/gr, $_ ] }
+ #map { [ (split)[0] =~ s/\Q$parm_ipv4/ip4.ip4.ip4.ip4/gr, $_ ] } # this is too modern for 5.10.1
+ map {
+ (my $k = (split)[0]) =~ s/\Q$parm_ipv4/ip4.ip4.ip4.ip4/g;
+ [ $k, $_ ]
+ }
do { local $/ = "\n "; <$in> };
foreach $item (@temp)
{