Bugtrack 1290 - Spec grammar fixes.

[users/heiko/exim.git] / test / mail / 0194.CALLER

diff --git a/test/mail/0194.CALLER b/test/mail/0194.CALLER
index 016cbc71dc68ff8369cd023046a527f711cc7a62..0a28b3f0e7b77c19ec46c7c1e728e9dfe6a2e73a 100644 (file)
--- a/test/mail/0194.CALLER
+++ b/test/mail/0194.CALLER
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@ From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Mar 02 09:44:33 1999
 Received: from EXIMUSER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        id 10HmaY-0005vi-00
        for CALLER@myhost.test.ex; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
 Received: from EXIMUSER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        id 10HmaY-0005vi-00
        for CALLER@myhost.test.ex; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
-Message-Id: <E10HmaY-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>

 X-Failed-Recipients: userz@myhost.test.ex,
   usery@myhost.test.ex,
   userx@myhost.test.ex
 X-Failed-Recipients: userz@myhost.test.ex,
   usery@myhost.test.ex,
   userx@myhost.test.ex


@@ -11,6 +9,8 @@ Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
 From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@myhost.test.ex>
 To: CALLER@myhost.test.ex
 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
 From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@myhost.test.ex>
 To: CALLER@myhost.test.ex
 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

+Message-Id: <E10HmaY-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>
+Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 
 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 
 
 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 


@@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ Return-path: <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>
 Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        (envelope-from <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>)
        id 10HmaX-0005vi-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
 Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        (envelope-from <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>)
        id 10HmaX-0005vi-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 Message-Id: <E10HmaX-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>
 From: CALLER_NAME <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>
 Message-Id: <E10HmaX-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>
 From: CALLER_NAME <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>

+Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 
 This is a test message.
 
 
 This is a test message.
 


@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Mar 02 09:44:33 1999
 Received: from EXIMUSER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        id 10HmbA-0005vi-00
        for CALLER@myhost.test.ex; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
 Received: from EXIMUSER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        id 10HmbA-0005vi-00
        for CALLER@myhost.test.ex; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
-Message-Id: <E10HmbA-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>

 X-Failed-Recipients: seven@myhost.test.ex,
   six@myhost.test.ex,
   five@myhost.test.ex,
 X-Failed-Recipients: seven@myhost.test.ex,
   six@myhost.test.ex,
   five@myhost.test.ex,


@@ -58,6 +56,8 @@ Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
 From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@myhost.test.ex>
 To: CALLER@myhost.test.ex
 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
 From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@myhost.test.ex>
 To: CALLER@myhost.test.ex
 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

+Message-Id: <E10HmbA-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>
+Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 
 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 
 
 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 


@@ -96,9 +96,9 @@ Return-path: <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>
 Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        (envelope-from <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>)
        id 10HmaZ-0005vi-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
 Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        (envelope-from <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>)
        id 10HmaZ-0005vi-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 Message-Id: <E10HmaZ-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>
 From: CALLER_NAME <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>
 Message-Id: <E10HmaZ-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>
 From: CALLER_NAME <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>

+Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 
 Here's another message.
 
 
 Here's another message.
 


@@ -106,8 +106,6 @@ From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Mar 02 09:44:33 1999
 Received: from EXIMUSER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        id 10HmbD-0005vi-00
        for CALLER@myhost.test.ex; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
 Received: from EXIMUSER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        id 10HmbD-0005vi-00
        for CALLER@myhost.test.ex; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
-Message-Id: <E10HmbD-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>

 X-Failed-Recipients: userz@myhost.test.ex,
   usery@myhost.test.ex,
   userx@myhost.test.ex
 X-Failed-Recipients: userz@myhost.test.ex,
   usery@myhost.test.ex,
   userx@myhost.test.ex


@@ -115,6 +113,8 @@ Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
 From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@myhost.test.ex>
 To: CALLER@myhost.test.ex
 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
 From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@myhost.test.ex>
 To: CALLER@myhost.test.ex
 Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

+Message-Id: <E10HmbD-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>
+Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 
 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 
 
 This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
 


@@ -142,10 +142,10 @@ Return-path: <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>
 Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        (envelope-from <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>)
        id 10HmbC-0005vi-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
 Received: from CALLER by myhost.test.ex with local (Exim x.yz)
        (envelope-from <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>)
        id 10HmbC-0005vi-00; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
-Message-Id: <E10HmbC-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>

 ret: 99
 ret: 99

+Message-Id: <E10HmbC-0005vi-00@myhost.test.ex>

 From: CALLER_NAME <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>
 From: CALLER_NAME <CALLER@myhost.test.ex>

+Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000

 
 More message 99
 
 
 More message 99