- if ((rc = sendto(sock, fastopen->data, fastopen->len,
- MSG_FASTOPEN | MSG_DONTWAIT, s_ptr, s_len)) < 0)
- if (errno == EINPROGRESS) /* expected for nonready peer */
- { /* queue the data */
- if ( (rc = send(sock, fastopen->data, fastopen->len, 0)) < 0
- && errno == EINPROGRESS) /* expected for nonready peer */
- rc = 0;
- }
- else if(errno == EOPNOTSUPP)
+ if ((rc = sendto(sock, fastopen_blob->data, fastopen_blob->len,
+ MSG_FASTOPEN | MSG_DONTWAIT, s_ptr, s_len)) >= 0)
+ /* seen for with-data, experimental TFO option, with-cookie case */
+ /* seen for with-data, proper TFO opt, with-cookie case */
+ {
+ DEBUG(D_transport|D_v)
+ debug_printf("non-TFO mode connection attempt to %s, %lu data\n",
+ address, (unsigned long)fastopen_blob->len);
+ /*XXX also seen on successful TFO, sigh */
+ tcp_out_fastopen = fastopen_blob->len > 0 ? 2 : 1;
+ }
+ else if (errno == EINPROGRESS) /* expected if we had no cookie for peer */
+ /* seen for no-data, proper TFO option, both cookie-request and with-cookie cases */
+ /* apparently no visibility of the diffference at this point */
+ /* seen for with-data, proper TFO opt, cookie-req */
+ /* with netwk delay, post-conn tcp_info sees unacked 1 for R, 2 for C; code in smtp_out.c */
+ /* ? older Experimental TFO option behaviour ? */
+ { /* queue unsent data */
+ DEBUG(D_transport|D_v) debug_printf("TFO mode sendto, %s data: EINPROGRESS\n",
+ fastopen_blob->len > 0 ? "with" : "no");
+ if (!fastopen_blob->data)