REQUIRETLS: amplify docs discussion

[exim.git] / doc / doc-txt / experimental-spec.txt

diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt b/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt
index 15df152676844c9dcd5dece3ea648ec2edd7a997..1bc5d027580814e91753486b4ed3326bca8ae79f 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt
+++ b/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ An option on the smtp transport, which constructs and prepends to the message
 an ARC set of headers.  The textually-first Authentication-Results: header
 is used as a basis (you must have added one on entry to the ADMD).
 Expanded as a whole; if unset, empty or forced-failure then no signing is done.
-If it is set, all three elements must be non-empty.
+If it is set, all of the first three elements must be non-empty.
 
 The fourth element is optional, and if present consists of a comma-separated list
 of options.  The options implemented are
@@ -838,12 +838,18 @@ Caveats:
  * There must be an Authentication-Results header, presumably added by an ACL
    while receiving the message, for the same ADMD, for arc_sign to succeed.
    This requires careful coordination between inbound and outbound logic.
+
+   Only one A-R header is taken account of.  This is a limitation versus
+   the ARC spec (which says that all A-R headers from within the ADMD must
+   be used).
+
  * If passing a message to another system, such as a mailing-list manager
    (MLM), between receipt and sending, be wary of manipulations to headers made
    by the MLM.
    + For instance, Mailman with REMOVE_DKIM_HEADERS==3 might improve
      deliverability in a pre-ARC world, but that option also renames the
      Authentication-Results header, which breaks signing.
+
  * Even if you use multiple DKIM keys for different domains, the ARC concept
    should try to stick to one ADMD, so pick a primary domain and use that for
    AR headers and outbound signing.
@@ -854,6 +860,40 @@ used via the transport in question.
 
 
 
+
+REQUIRETLS support
+------------------
+Ref: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-uta-smtp-require-tls-03
+
+If compiled with EXPERIMENTAL_REQUIRETLS support is included for this
+feature, where a REQUIRETLS option is added to the MAIL command.
+The client may not retry in clear if the MAIL+REQUIRETLS fails (or was never
+offered), and the server accepts an obligation that any onward transmission
+by SMTP of the messages accepted will also use REQUIRETLS - or generate a
+fail DSN.
+
+The Exim implementation includes
+- a main-part option tls_advertise_requiretls; host list, default "*"
+- an observability variable $requiretls returning yes/no
+- an ACL "control = requiretls" modifier for setting the requirement
+- Log lines and Received: headers capitalise the S in the protocol
+  element: "P=esmtpS"
+
+Differences from spec:
+- we support upgrading the requirement for REQUIRETLS, including adding
+  it from cold, within an MTA.  The spec only define the sourcing MUA
+  as being able to source the requirement, and makes no mention of upgrade.
+- No support is coded for the RequireTLS header (which can be used
+  to annul DANE and/or STS policiy). [this can _almost_ be done in
+  transport option expansions, but not quite: it requires tha DANE-present
+  but STARTTLS-failing targets fallback to cleartext, which current DANE
+  coding specifically blocks]
+
+Note that REQUIRETLS is only advertised once a TLS connection is achieved
+(in contrast to STARTTLS).  If you want to check the advertising, do something
+like "swaks -s 127.0.0.1 -tls -q HELO".
+
+
 --------------------------------------------------------------
 End of file
 --------------------------------------------------------------