Bug-fix no_require_dnssec parsing & spelling fixes

[exim.git] / src / src / auths / spa.c

diff --git a/src/src/auths/spa.c b/src/src/auths/spa.c
index dc859674e75d0813d07dcf1458bf5025e0e2513b..4d435a411cd03338269bf87ea4e0d46614bf407f 100644 (file)
--- a/src/src/auths/spa.c
+++ b/src/src/auths/spa.c
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
-/* $Cambridge: exim/src/src/auths/spa.c,v 1.2 2004/12/20 14:57:05 ph10 Exp $ */
-
 /*************************************************
 *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
 *************************************************/
 
-/* Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 1995 - 2004 */
+/* Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 1995 - 2009 */
 /* See the file NOTICE for conditions of use and distribution. */
 
 /* This file, which provides support for Microsoft's Secure Password
@@ -14,6 +12,7 @@ server support. I (PH) have only modified it in very trivial ways.
 References:
   http://www.innovation.ch/java/ntlm.html
   http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/4/28/1436/66154
+  http://download.microsoft.com/download/9/5/e/95ef66af-9026-4bb0-a41d-a4f81802d92c/%5bMS-SMTP%5d.pdf
 
  * It seems that some systems have existing but different definitions of some
  * of the following types. I received a complaint about "int16" causing
@@ -25,8 +24,10 @@ References:
  * typedef unsigned uint32;
  * typedef unsigned char  uint8;
 
-07-August-2003: PH: Patched up the code to avoid assert bombouts for stupid
-                    input data. Find appropriate comment by grepping for "PH".
+07-August-2003:  PH: Patched up the code to avoid assert bombouts for stupid
+                     input data. Find appropriate comment by grepping for "PH".
+16-October-2006: PH: Added a call to auth_check_serv_cond() at the end
+05-June-2010:    PP: handle SASL initial response
 */
 
 
@@ -60,7 +61,7 @@ address can appear in the tables drtables.c. */
 int auth_spa_options_count =
   sizeof(auth_spa_options)/sizeof(optionlist);
 
-/* Default private options block for the contidion authentication method. */
+/* Default private options block for the condition authentication method. */
 
 auth_spa_options_block auth_spa_option_defaults = {
   NULL,              /* spa_password */
@@ -127,15 +128,17 @@ SPAAuthResponse  *responseptr = &response;
 uschar msgbuf[2048];
 uschar *clearpass;
 
-/* send a 334, MS Exchange style, and grab the client's request */
+/* send a 334, MS Exchange style, and grab the client's request,
+unless we already have it via an initial response. */
 
-if (auth_get_no64_data(&data, US"NTLM supported") != OK)
+if ((*data == '\0') &&
+    (auth_get_no64_data(&data, US"NTLM supported") != OK))
   {
   /* something borked */
   return FAIL;
   }
 
-if (spa_base64_to_bits((char *)(&request), (const char *)(data)) < 0)
+if (spa_base64_to_bits((char *)(&request), sizeof(request), (const char *)(data)) < 0)
   {
   DEBUG(D_auth) debug_printf("auth_spa_server(): bad base64 data in "
   "request: %s\n", data);
@@ -155,15 +158,13 @@ if (auth_get_no64_data(&data, msgbuf) != OK)
   }
 
 /* dump client response */
-if (spa_base64_to_bits((char *)(&response), (const char *)(data)) < 0)
+if (spa_base64_to_bits((char *)(&response), sizeof(response), (const char *)(data)) < 0)
   {
   DEBUG(D_auth) debug_printf("auth_spa_server(): bad base64 data in "
   "response: %s\n", data);
   return FAIL;
   }
 
-/* get username and put it in $1 */
-
 /***************************************************************
 PH 07-Aug-2003: The original code here was this:
 
@@ -194,10 +195,17 @@ that causes failure if the size of msgbuf is exceeded. ****/
 
 /***************************************************************/
 
-expand_nstring[1] = msgbuf;
+/* Put the username in $auth1 and $1. The former is now the preferred variable;
+the latter is the original variable. These have to be out of stack memory, and
+need to be available once known even if not authenticated, for error messages
+(server_set_id, which only makes it to authenticated_id if we return OK) */
+
+auth_vars[0] = expand_nstring[1] = string_copy(msgbuf);
 expand_nlength[1] = Ustrlen(msgbuf);
 expand_nmax = 1;
 
+debug_print_string(ablock->server_debug_string);    /* customized debug */
+
 /* look up password */
 
 clearpass = expand_string(ob->spa_serverpassword);
@@ -228,7 +236,11 @@ if (memcmp(ntRespData,
       ((unsigned char*)responseptr)+IVAL(&responseptr->ntResponse.offset,0),
       24) == 0)
   /* success. we have a winner. */
-  return OK;
+  {
+  return auth_check_serv_cond(ablock);
+  }
+
+  /* Expand server_condition as an authorization check (PH) */
 
 return FAIL;
 }
@@ -260,6 +272,8 @@ auth_spa_client(
 
        /* Code added by PH to expand the options */
 
+       *buffer = 0;    /* Default no message when cancelled */
+
        username = CS expand_string(ob->spa_username);
        if (username == NULL)
          {
@@ -324,7 +338,7 @@ auth_spa_client(
        /* convert the challenge into the challenge struct */
        DSPA("\n\n%s authenticator: challenge (%s)\n\n",
                ablock->name, buffer + 4);
-       spa_base64_to_bits ((char *)(&challenge), (const char *)(buffer + 4));
+       spa_base64_to_bits ((char *)(&challenge), sizeof(challenge), (const char *)(buffer + 4));
 
        spa_build_auth_response (&challenge, &response,
                CS username, CS password);