git://git.exim.org / exim.git / blobdiff
? search:
summary | shortlog | log | commit | commitdiff | tree
raw | inline | side by side
Hintsdb: fix dumpdb for sqlite
[exim.git] / test / scripts / 4000-scanning / 4003
diff --git a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4003 b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4003
index 0bfa14e9ec86391e02a439dec73cc941b23e10b3..1f4917d9b2f6dd3ef101d3b853279f5ce58aeafa 100644 (file)
--- a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4003
+++ b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4003
@@ -1,62 +1,246 @@
-# content scan interface: fsecure
-#
-server DIR/eximdir/fsec_sock
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<SCAN
->LF>random ignored line
->LF>random ignored line 2
->LF>OK Scan ok.
+# content scan interface: spamassassin
+#
+# The spooled file for scanning includes the test-runner's user name
+# hence size varies.  Munge that.
+munge scanfile_size
+#
+#
+# A good-comms test, returning not-spam.
+# (we could use a second one that returns is-spam...)
+server 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received:
+<      by
+<      (envelope
+<      id
+<      for
+<      
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
+<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview:  test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name              description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
+>
 *eof
 ****
 *eof
 ****
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Content-type: text/plain
+
+test
+.
+quit
+****
+#
 #
 #
 #
 #
 #
 #
-exim -odi -bs
+# Server spec line with timeout option, not exercised
+# (could we cut down the massive content?)
+server 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received:
+<      by
+<      (envelope
+<      id
+<      for
+<      
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
+<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview:  test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name              description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
+>
+*eof
+****
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='127.0.0.1 7833 retry=10s'
 ehlo test.ex
 ehlo test.ex
-mail from:<>
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
 rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
 data
 rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
 data
-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:35:01 +0100
-Subject: message should be accepted
+Content-type: text/plain
 
 
+test
 .
 quit
 ****
 #
 #
 #
 .
 quit
 ****
 #
 #
 #
-server DIR/eximdir/fsec_sock
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<CONFIGURE
->ignored_response
-<SCAN
->LF>xxxINFECTED        blah    VNAME   blah
->LF>OK Scan ok.
+# Server spec line with timeout option, exercised
+server -i 2 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received:
+<      by
+<      (envelope
+<      id
+<      for
+<      
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
+<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview:  test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name              description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
+>
 *eof
 ****
 *eof
 ****
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='127.0.0.1 7833 retry=4s'
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Content-type: text/plain
+
+test
+.
+quit
+****
 #
 #
 #
 #
 #
 #
-exim -odi -bs
+# Multiple servers, prioritised, with timeout spec; first one fails
+# List separator changed
+server 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received:
+<      by
+<      (envelope
+<      id
+<      for
+<      
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
+<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview:  test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details:   (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name              description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS        Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM           Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT        Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE           Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID            Missing Message-Id: header
+>
+*eof
+****
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='<; 127.0.0.1 7833 ; HOSTIPV4 7834 pri=2 tmo=2s'
 ehlo test.ex
 ehlo test.ex
-mail from:<>
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
 rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
 data
 rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
 data
-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:35:01 +0100
-Subject: message should be rejected
+Content-type: text/plain
 
 
+test
 .
 quit
 ****
 .
 quit
 ****
+#
+#
Master Exim source repository