Fix spec

[exim.git] / doc / doc-docbook / spec.xfpt

diff --git a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
index 2de41c60671af23ce613b9e315f93e4565ffe395..94b97fab0f1fe99041f537e9cfdc56cbfa6f22ef 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
+++ b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt
@@ -30790,7 +30790,7 @@ restrictions, to get the TXT record. As a byproduct of this, there is also
 a check that the IP being tested is indeed on the first list. The first
 domain is the one that is put in &$dnslist_domain$&. For example:
 .code
 a check that the IP being tested is indeed on the first list. The first
 domain is the one that is put in &$dnslist_domain$&. For example:
 .code

-reject message  = \
+deny message  = \

          rejected because $sender_host_address is blacklisted \
          at $dnslist_domain\n$dnslist_text
        dnslists = \
          rejected because $sender_host_address is blacklisted \
          at $dnslist_domain\n$dnslist_text
        dnslists = \


@@ -30808,7 +30808,7 @@ If you are interested in more than one merged list, the same list must be
 given several times, but because the results of the DNS lookups are cached,
 the DNS calls themselves are not repeated. For example:
 .code
 given several times, but because the results of the DNS lookups are cached,
 the DNS calls themselves are not repeated. For example:
 .code

-reject dnslists = \
+deny dnslists = \

          http.dnsbl.sorbs.net,dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.2 : \
          socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net,dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.3 : \
          misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net,dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.4 : \
          http.dnsbl.sorbs.net,dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.2 : \
          socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net,dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.3 : \
          misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net,dnsbl.sorbs.net=127.0.0.4 : \


@@ -39071,7 +39071,7 @@ certtool --load_privkey=dkim_ed25519.private --pubkey_info --outder | tail -c +1
 Note that the format
 of Ed25519 keys in DNS has not yet been decided; this release supports
 both of the leading candidates at this time, a future release will
 Note that the format
 of Ed25519 keys in DNS has not yet been decided; this release supports
 both of the leading candidates at this time, a future release will

-probably drop support for whichever proposal loses
+probably drop support for whichever proposal loses.

 .wen
 
 .option dkim_hash smtp string&!! sha256
 .wen
 
 .option dkim_hash smtp string&!! sha256