.set I " "
.macro copyyear
-2013
+2014
.endmacro
. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
.cindex "expansion" "case forcing"
.cindex "&%uc%& expansion item"
This forces the letters in the string into upper-case.
+
+.vitem &*${utf8clean:*&<&'string'&>&*}*&
+.cindex "correction of invalid utf-8 sequences in strings"
+.cindex "utf-8" "utf-8 sequences"
+.cindex "incorrect utf-8"
+.cindex "expansion" "utf-8 forcing"
+.cindex "&%utf8clean%& expansion item"
+This replaces any invalid utf-8 sequence in the string by the character &`?`&.
.endlist
It is likely that you will need to coerce DNSSEC support on in the resolver
library, by setting:
.code
-dns_use_dnssec = 1
+dns_dnssec_ok = 1
.endd
Exim does not perform DNSSEC validation itself, instead leaving that to a
.row &%disable_ipv6%& "do no IPv6 processing"
.row &%dns_again_means_nonexist%& "for broken domains"
.row &%dns_check_names_pattern%& "pre-DNS syntax check"
+.row &%dns_dnssec_ok%& "parameter for resolver"
.row &%dns_ipv4_lookup%& "only v4 lookup for these domains"
.row &%dns_retrans%& "parameter for resolver"
.row &%dns_retry%& "parameter for resolver"
-.row &%dns_use_dnssec%& "parameter for resolver"
.row &%dns_use_edns0%& "parameter for resolver"
.row &%hold_domains%& "hold delivery for these domains"
.row &%local_interfaces%& "for routing checks"
reversed and looked up in the reverse DNS, as described in more detail in
section &<<SECTverifyCSA>>&.
+
+.option dns_dnssec_ok main integer -1
+.cindex "DNS" "resolver options"
+.cindex "DNS" "DNSSEC"
+If this option is set to a non-negative number then Exim will initialise the
+DNS resolver library to either use or not use DNSSEC, overriding the system
+default. A value of 0 coerces DNSSEC off, a value of 1 coerces DNSSEC on.
+
+If the resolver library does not support DNSSEC then this option has no effect.
+
+
.option dns_ipv4_lookup main "domain list&!!" unset
.cindex "IPv6" "DNS lookup for AAAA records"
.cindex "DNS" "IPv6 lookup for AAAA records"
See &%dns_retrans%& above.
-.option dns_use_dnssec main integer -1
-.cindex "DNS" "resolver options"
-.cindex "DNS" "DNSSEC"
-If this option is set to a non-negative number then Exim will initialise the
-DNS resolver library to either use or not use DNSSEC, overriding the system
-default. A value of 0 coerces DNSSEC off, a value of 1 coerces DNSSEC on.
-
-If the resolver library does not support DNSSEC then this option has no effect.
-
-
.option dns_use_edns0 main integer -1
.cindex "DNS" "resolver options"
.cindex "DNS" "EDNS0"
Note that routers are used in verify mode. Note also that headers cannot be
modified by any of the post-data ACLs (DATA, MIME and DKIM).
+Cutthrough delivery is not supported via transport-filters or when DKIM signing
+of outgoing messages is done, because it sends data to the ultimate destination
+before the entire message has been received from the source.
Should the ultimate destination system positively accept or reject the mail,
a corresponding indication is given to the source system and nothing is queued.
Delivery in this mode avoids the generation of a bounce mail to a (possibly faked)
sender when the destination system is doing content-scan based rejection.
-Cutthrough delivery is not supported via transport-filters.
.vitem &*control&~=&~debug/*&<&'options'&>
send email. Details of how this works are given in section
&<<SECTverifyCSA>>&.
+.new
+.vitem &*verify&~=&~header_names_ascii*&
+.cindex "&%verify%& ACL condition"
+.cindex "&ACL;" "verifying header names only ASCII"
+.cindex "header lines" "verifying header names only ASCII"
+.cindex "verifying" "header names only ASCII"
+This condition is relevant only in an ACL that is run after a message has been
+received, that is, in an ACL specified by &%acl_smtp_data%& or
+&%acl_not_smtp%&. It checks all header names (not the content) to make sure
+there are no non-ASCII characters, also excluding control characters. The
+allowable characters are decimal ASCII values 33 through 126.
+
+Exim itself will handle headers with non-ASCII characters, but it can cause
+problems for downstream applications, so this option will allow their
+detection and rejection in the DATA ACL's.
+.wen
+
.vitem &*verify&~=&~header_sender/*&<&'options'&>
.cindex "&%verify%& ACL condition"
.cindex "&ACL;" "verifying sender in the header"
dnslists = some.list.example
.endd
+If an explicit key is being used for a DNS lookup and it may be an IPv6
+address you should specify alternate list separators for both the outer
+(DNS list name) list and inner (lookup keys) list:
+.code
+ dnslists = <; dnsbl.example.com/<|$acl_m_addrslist
+.endd
+
.section "Rate limiting incoming messages" "SECTratelimiting"
.cindex "rate limiting" "client sending"
.cindex "limiting client sending rates"
&`R `& on &`<=`& lines: reference for local bounce
&` `& on &`=>`& &`**`& and &`==`& lines: router name
&`S `& size of message
+&`SNI `& server name indication from TLS client hello
&`ST `& shadow transport name
&`T `& on &`<=`& lines: message subject (topic)
&` `& on &`=>`& &`**`& and &`==`& lines: transport name
.next
.cindex "log" "smtp confirmation"
.cindex "SMTP" "logging confirmation"
-&%smtp_confirmation%&: The response to the final &"."& in the SMTP dialogue for
+.cindex "LMTP" "logging confirmation"
+&%smtp_confirmation%&: The response to the final &"."& in the SMTP or LMTP dialogue for
outgoing messages is added to delivery log lines in the form &`C=`&<&'text'&>.
A number of MTAs (including Exim) return an identifying string in this
response.
Exim's DKIM implementation allows to
.olist
Sign outgoing messages: This function is implemented in the SMTP transport.
-It can co-exist with all other Exim features, including transport filters.
+It can co-exist with all other Exim features
+(including transport filters)
+except cutthrough delivery.
.next
Verify signatures in incoming messages: This is implemented by an additional
ACL (acl_smtp_dkim), which can be called several times per message, with
Verification of DKIM signatures in incoming email is implemented via the
&%acl_smtp_dkim%& ACL. By default, this ACL is called once for each
syntactically(!) correct signature in the incoming message.
+A missing ACL definition defaults to accept.
+If any ACL call does not acccept, the message is not accepted.
+If a cutthrough delivery was in progress for the message it is
+summarily dropped (having wasted the transmission effort).
To evaluate the signature in the ACL a large number of expansion variables
containing the signature status and its details are set up during the
git://git.exim.org / exim.git / blobdiff