-# content scan interface: rspamd
+# content scan interface: spamassassin
#
# The spooled file for scanning includes the test-runner's user name
# hence size varies. Munge that.
munge scanfile_size
#
-server 11333
-<CHECK RSPAMC/1.3
+#
+# A good-comms test, returning not-spam.
+# (we could use a second one that returns is-spam...)
+server 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received:
+< by
+< (envelope
+< id
+< for
+<
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
+<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email. If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview: test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
+>
+*eof
+****
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Content-type: text/plain
+
+test
+.
+quit
+****
+#
+#
+#
+#
+# Server spec line with timeout option, not exercised
+# (could we cut down the massive content?)
+server 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
<Content-length:
-<Queue-Id:
+<
+<From
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received:
+< by
+< (envelope
+< id
+< for
+<
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
<From:
-<Recipient-Number: 1
-<Rcpt:
-<Helo:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email. If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview: test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
+>
+*eof
+****
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='127.0.0.1 7833 retry=10s'
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Content-type: text/plain
+
+test
+.
+quit
+****
+#
+#
+#
+# Server spec line with timeout option, exercised
+server -i 2 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
<User:
+<Content-length:
<
<From
<X-Envelope-From
< (envelope
< id
< for
+<
+<Content-type: text/plain
+<Message-Id:
<From:
+<Date:
+<
+<test
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email. If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview: test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
+>
+*eof
+****
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='127.0.0.1 7833 retry=4s'
+ehlo test.ex
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
+rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
+data
+Content-type: text/plain
+
+test
+.
+quit
+****
+#
+#
+#
+# Multiple servers, prioritised, with timeout spec; first one fails
+# List separator changed
+server 7833
+<REPORT SPAMC
+<User:
+<Content-length:
+<
+<From
+<X-Envelope-From
+<X-Envelope-To
+<Received:
+< by
+< (envelope
+< id
+< for
+<
<Content-type: text/plain
<Message-Id:
-<Sender:
+<From:
<Date:
<
<test
->RSPAMD/1.3 0 EX_OK
->Metric: default; True; 15.00 / 15.00 / 0.0
->Action: reject
->Symbol: FAKE_SYMBOL_A(15.00)
->Symbol: FAKE_SYMBOL_B(0.00)
->Message-ID: undef
+>SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK
+>Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0
+>
+>Spam detection software, running on the system "demo",
+>has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
+>message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
+>similar future email. If you have any questions, see
+>@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
+>
+>Content preview: test [...]
+>
+>Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required)
+>
+> pts rule name description
+>---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
+>-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
+> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
+> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header
+> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
+> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header
+> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
+>
*eof
****
-exim -odi -bs
+exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='<; 127.0.0.1 7833 ; HOSTIPV4 7834 pri=2 tmo=2s'
ehlo test.ex
-mail from:<>
+mail from:<fromuser@myhost.test.ex>
rcpt to:<userx@test.ex>
data
-From: MAILER_DAEMON <>
Content-type: text/plain
test
.
quit
****
+#
+#
git://git.exim.org / exim.git / blobdiff