X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/users/jgh/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/e688a727fee2c1b763e7bfdf3c3e6fbd781af3fb..a9bade1bafed6b15f68ad49ab45e2e343a853079:/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt diff --git a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt index 96f35fe4b..9eaf9e804 100644 --- a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt +++ b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt @@ -2991,6 +2991,26 @@ The specified sender is treated as if it were given as the argument to the preference to the address taken from the message. The caller of Exim must be a trusted user for the sender of a message to be set in this way. +.vitem &%-bmalware%&&~<&'filename'&> +.oindex "&%-bmalware%&" +.cindex "testing", "malware" +.cindex "malware scan test" +This debugging option causes Exim to scan the given file, +using the malware scanning framework. The option of &%av_scanner%& influences +this option, so if &%av_scanner%&'s value is dependent upon an expansion then +the expansion should have defaults which apply to this invocation. ACLs are +not invoked, so if &%av_scanner%& references an ACL variable then that variable +will never be populated and &%-bmalware%& will fail. + +Exim will have changed working directory before resolving the filename, so +using fully qualified pathnames is advisable. Exim will be running as the Exim +user when it tries to open the file, rather than as the invoking user. +This option requires admin privileges. + +The &%-bmalware%& option will not be extended to be more generally useful, +there are better tools for file-scanning. This option exists to help +administrators verify their Exim and AV scanner configuration. + .vitem &%-bnq%& .oindex "&%-bnq%&" .cindex "address qualification, suppressing" @@ -3251,26 +3271,6 @@ above concerning senders and qualification do not apply. In this situation, Exim behaves in exactly the same way as it does when receiving a message via the listening daemon. -.vitem &%-bmalware%&&~<&'filename'&> -.oindex "&%-bmalware%&" -.cindex "testing", "malware" -.cindex "malware scan test" -This debugging option causes Exim to scan the given file, -using the malware scanning framework. The option of &%av_scanner%& influences -this option, so if &%av_scanner%&'s value is dependent upon an expansion then -the expansion should have defaults which apply to this invocation. ACLs are -not invoked, so if &%av_scanner%& references an ACL variable then that variable -will never be populated and &%-bmalware%& will fail. - -Exim will have changed working directory before resolving the filename, so -using fully qualified pathnames is advisable. Exim will be running as the Exim -user when it tries to open the file, rather than as the invoking user. -This option requires admin privileges. - -The &%-bmalware%& option will not be extended to be more generally useful, -there are better tools for file-scanning. This option exists to help -administrators verify their Exim and AV scanner configuration. - .vitem &%-bt%& .oindex "&%-bt%&" .cindex "testing" "addresses" @@ -6026,16 +6026,16 @@ that it implements the details of the specific authentication mechanism, i.e. PLAIN or LOGIN. The &%server_advertise_condition%& setting controls when Exim offers authentication to clients; in the examples, this is only when TLS or SSL has been started, so to enable the authenticators you also -need to add support for TLS as described in &<>&. +need to add support for TLS as described in section &<>&. The &%server_condition%& setting defines how to verify that the username and password are correct. In the examples it just produces an error message. To make the authenticators work, you can use a string expansion -expression like one of the examples in &<>&. +expression like one of the examples in chapter &<>&. Beware that the sequence of the parameters to PLAIN and LOGIN differ; the -usercode and password are in different positions. &<>& -covers both. +usercode and password are in different positions. +Chapter &<>& covers both. .ecindex IIDconfiwal @@ -17103,6 +17103,40 @@ look for A or AAAA records, unless the domain matches &%mx_domains%&, in which case routing fails. +.new +.section "Declining addresses by dnslookup" "SECTdnslookupdecline" +.cindex "&(dnslookup)& router" "declines" +There are a few cases where a &(dnslookup)& router will decline to accept +an address; if such a router is expected to handle "all remaining non-local +domains", then it is important to set &%no_more%&. + +Reasons for a &(dnslookup)& router to decline currently include: +.ilist +The domain does not exist in DNS +.next +The domain exists but the MX record's host part is just "."; this is a common +convention (borrowed from SRV) used to indicate that there is no such service +for this domain and to not fall back to trying A/AAAA records. +.next +Ditto, but for SRV records, when &%check_srv%& is set on this router. +.next +MX record points to a non-existent host. +.next +MX record points to an IP address and the main section option +&%allow_mx_to_ip%& is not set. +.next +MX records exist and point to valid hosts, but all hosts resolve only to +addresses blocked by the &%ignore_target_hosts%& generic option on this router. +.next +The domain is not syntactically valid (see also &%allow_utf8_domains%& and +&%dns_check_names_pattern%& for handling one variant of this) +.next +&%check_secondary_mx%& is set on this router but the local host can +not be found in the MX records (see below) +.endlist +.wen + + .section "Private options for dnslookup" "SECID118"