X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/users/jgh/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/5ca2a9a1a936ecc55402a1d40b7d8adb74865aba..d71748467d1443be8c3b84a23839ea975c125b0d:/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog index 4d7dd8517..758317801 100644 --- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog +++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.117 2005/04/06 15:26:52 ph10 Exp $ +$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.123 2005/04/07 15:37:13 ph10 Exp $ Change log file for Exim from version 4.21 ------------------------------------------- @@ -190,6 +190,46 @@ PH/30 In these circumstances: and peerdn, if requested) that were in fact used only for the second address. +PH/31 When doing a callout as part of verifying an address, Exim was not paying + attention to any local part prefix or suffix that was matched by the + router that accepted the address. It now behaves in the same way as it + does for delivery: the affixes are removed from the local part unless + rcpt_include_affixes is set on the transport. + +PH/32 Add the sender address, as F=<...>, to the log line when logging a + timeout during the DATA phase of an incoming message. + +PH/33 Sieve envelope tests were broken for match types other than :is. I have + applied a patch sanctioned by the Sieve maintainer. + +PH/34 Change 4.50/80 broke Exim in that it could no longer handle cases where + the uid or gid is negative. A case of a negative gid caused this to be + noticed. The fix allows for either to be negative. + +PH/35 ACL_WHERE_MIME is now declared unconditionally, to avoid too much code + clutter, but the tables that are indexed by ACL_WHERE_xxx values had been + overlooked. + +PH/36 The change PH/12 above was broken. Fixed it. + +PH/37 Exim used to check for duplicate addresses in the middle of routing, on + the grounds that routing the same address twice would always produce the + same answer. This might have been true once, but it is certainly no + longer true now. Routing a child address may depend on the previous + routing that produced that child. Some complicated redirection strategies + went wrong when messages had multiple recipients, and made Exim's + behaviour dependent on the order in which the addresses were given. + + I have moved the duplicate checking until after the routing is complete. + Exim scans the addresses that are assigned to local and remote + transports, and removes any duplicates. This means that more work will be + done, as duplicates will always all be routed, but duplicates are + presumably rare, so I don't expect this is of any significance. + + For deliveries to pipes, files, and autoreplies, the duplicate checking + still happens during the routing process, since they are not going to be + routed further. + A note about Exim versions 4.44 and 4.50 ----------------------------------------