X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/users/jgh/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/411ef850bbc5eba056d314edef8124105d480a4a..f6c332bd03c89f108c7fe531156cb18d7888ba35:/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog index 2355e01fc..04ed8e86b 100644 --- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog +++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.408 2006/10/16 10:58:39 ph10 Exp $ +$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.417 2006/10/30 16:41:04 ph10 Exp $ Change log file for Exim from version 4.21 ------------------------------------------- @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ PH/11 Callouts were setting the name used for EHLO/HELO from $smtp_active_ addresses), $smtp_active_hostname is used. PH/12 Installed Andrey Panin's patch to add a dovecot authenticator. Various - tweaks were necessary in order to get it to work: + tweaks were necessary in order to get it to work (see also 21 below): (a) The code assumed that strncpy() returns a negative number on buffer overflow, which isn't the case. Replaced with Exim's string_format() function. @@ -142,6 +142,70 @@ PH/20 It was discovered that the GnuTLS code had support for RSA_EXPORT, a effect of slowing Exim down by computing (never used) parameters for the RSA_EXPORT functionality. +PH/21 On the advice of Timo Sirainen, added a check to the dovecot + authenticator to fail if there's a tab character in the incoming data + (there should never be unless someone is messing about, as it's supposed + to be base64-encoded). Also added, on Timo's advice, the "secured" option + if the connection is using TLS or if the remote IP is the same as the + local IP, and the "valid-client-cert option" if a client certificate has + been verified. + +PH/22 As suggested by Dennis Davis, added a server_condition option to *all* + authenticators. This can be used for authorization after authentication + succeeds. (In the case of plaintext, it servers for both authentication + and authorization.) + +PH/23 Testing for tls_required and lost_connection in a retry rule didn't work + if any retry times were supplied. + +PH/24 Exim crashed if verify=helo was activated during an incoming -bs + connection, where there is no client IP address to check. In this + situation, the verify now always succeeds. + +PH/25 Applied John Jetmore's -Mset patch. + +PH/26 Added -bem to be like -Mset, but loading a message from a file. + +PH/27 In a string expansion for a processed (not raw) header when multiple + headers of the same name were present, leading whitespace was being + removed from all of them, but trailing whitespace was being removed only + from the last one. Now trailing whitespace is removed from each header + before concatenation. Completely empty headers in a concatenation (as + before) are ignored. + +PH/28 Fixed bug in backwards-compatibility feature of PH/09 (thanks to John + Jetmore). It would have mis-read ACL variables from pre-4.61 spool files. + +PH/29 After an address error (typically a 4xx response from a server), Exim + always tries the failing address if it appears in a new message, but + respects the retry time otherwise. This was implemented by checking for + being in a queue run, which isn't quite right. Now it checks the + "first_delivery" flag instead. + +PH/30 Exim was sometimes attempting to deliver messages that had suffered + address errors (4xx response to RCPT) over the same connection as other + messages routed to the same hosts. Such deliveries are always "forced", + so retry times are not inspected. This resulted in far too many retries + for the affected addresses. The effect occurred only when there were more + hosts than the hosts_max_try setting in the smtp transport when it had + the 4xx errors. Those hosts that it had tried were not added to the list + of hosts for which the message was waiting, so if all were tried, there + was no problem. Two fixes have been applied: + + (i) If there are any address or message errors in an SMTP delivery, none + of the hosts (tried or untried) are now added to the list of hosts + for which the message is waiting, so the message should not be a + candidate for sending over the same connection that was used for a + successful delivery of some other message. This seems entirely + reasonable: after all the message is NOT "waiting for some host". + This is so "obvious" that I'm not sure why it wasn't done + previously. Hope I haven't missed anything, but it can't do any + harm, as the worst effect is to miss an optimization. + + (ii) If, despite (i), such a delivery is accidentally attempted, the + routing retry time is respected, so at least it doesn't keep + hammering the server. + Exim version 4.63 -----------------