X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/users/jgh/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/21eb6e72d6d616a6430e1346e085b7cc74298f88..b4ed4da0f525ab98c05797e15df0045e49ae3618:/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog index 1a8a1af5d..3b98e0e0c 100644 --- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog +++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog @@ -1,8 +1,54 @@ -$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.446 2006/12/19 14:51:34 ph10 Exp $ +$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.452 2007/01/15 15:59:22 ph10 Exp $ Change log file for Exim from version 4.21 ------------------------------------------- +Exim version 4.67 +----------------- + +PH/01 Added a new log selector smtp_no_mail, to log SMTP sessions that do not + issue a MAIL command. + + +Exim version 4.66 +----------------- + +PH/01 Two more bugs that were introduced by 4.64/PH/07, in addition to the one + fixed by 4.65/MH/01 (is this a record?) are fixed: + + (i) An empty string was always treated as zero by the numeric comparison + operators. This behaviour has been restored. + + (ii) It is documented that the numeric comparison operators always treat + their arguments as decimal numbers. This was broken in that numbers + starting with 0 were being interpreted as octal. + + While fixing these problems I realized that there was another issue that + hadn't been noticed. Values of message_size_limit (both the global option + and the transport option) were treated as octal if they started with 0. + The documentation was vague. These values are now always treated as + decimal, and I will make that clear in the documentation. + + +Exim version 4.65 +----------------- + +TK/01 Disable default definition of HAVE_LINUX_SENDFILE. Clashes with + Linux large file support (_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64) on older glibc + versions. (#438) + +MH/01 Don't check that the operands of numeric comparison operators are + integers when their expansion is in "skipping" mode (fixes bug + introduced by 4.64-PH/07). + +PH/01 If a system filter or a router generates more than SHRT_MAX (32767) + child addresses, Exim now panics and dies. Previously, because the count + is held in a short int, deliveries were likely to be lost. As such a + large number of recipients for a single message is ridiculous + (performance will be very, very poor), I have chosen to impose a limit + rather than extend the field. + + Exim version 4.64 ----------------- @@ -357,6 +403,8 @@ PH/53 Added missing "#include " to pcre/pcretest.c (this was a PCRE PH/54 Applied Robert Bannocks' patch to avoid a problem with references that arises when using the Solaris LDAP libraries (but not with OpenLDAP). +PH/55 Check for a ridiculously long file name in exim_dbmbuild. + Exim version 4.63 -----------------