X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/users/heiko/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/eb57651e8badf0b65af0371732e42f2ee5c7772c..e51c7be22dfccad376659a1a46cee93c9979bbf7:/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt?ds=sidebyside diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt b/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt index f21609662..588543454 100644 --- a/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt +++ b/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt @@ -6,34 +6,6 @@ about experimental features, all of which are unstable and liable to incompatible change. -PRDR support --------------------------------------------------------------- - -Per-Recipient Data Reponse is an SMTP extension proposed by Eric Hall -in a (now-expired) IETF draft from 2007. It's not hit mainstream -use, but has apparently been implemented in the META1 MTA. - -There is mention at http://mail.aegee.org/intern/sendmail.html -of a patch to sendmail "to make it PRDR capable". - - ref: http://www.eric-a-hall.com/specs/draft-hall-prdr-00.txt - -If Exim is built with EXPERIMENTAL_PRDR there is a new config -boolean "prdr_enable" which controls whether PRDR is advertised -as part of an EHLO response, a new "acl_data_smtp_prdr" ACL -(called for each recipient, after data arrives but before the -data ACL), and a new smtp transport option "hosts_try_prdr". - -PRDR may be used to support per-user content filtering. Without it -one must defer any recipient after the first that has a different -content-filter configuration. With PRDR, the RCPT-time check -for this can be disabled when the MAIL-time $smtp_command included -"PRDR". Any required difference in behaviour of the main DATA-time -ACL should however depend on the PRDR-time ACL having run, as Exim -will avoid doing so in some situations (eg. single-recipient mails). - - - OCSP Stapling support -------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -69,7 +41,8 @@ starts retrying to fetch an OCSP proof some time before its current proof expires. The downside is that it requires server support. If Exim is built with EXPERIMENTAL_OCSP and it was built with OpenSSL, -then it gains a new global option: "tls_ocsp_file". +or with GnuTLS 3.1.3 or later, then it gains a new global option: +"tls_ocsp_file". The file specified therein is expected to be in DER format, and contain an OCSP proof. Exim will serve it as part of the TLS handshake. This @@ -83,14 +56,21 @@ contents are always valid. Exim will expand the "tls_ocsp_file" option on each connection, so a new file will be handled transparently on the next connection. -Exim will check for a valid next update timestamp in the OCSP proof; -if not present, or if the proof has expired, it will be ignored. +Under OpenSSL Exim will check for a valid next update timestamp in the +OCSP proof; if not present, or if the proof has expired, it will be +ignored. + +Also, given EXPERIMENTAL_OCSP, the smtp transport gains two options: +- "hosts_require_ocsp"; a host-list for which an OCSP Stapling +is requested and required for the connection to proceed. The default +value is empty. +- "hosts_request_ocsp"; a host-list for which (additionally) an OCSP +Stapling is requested (but not necessarily verified). The default +value is "*" meaning that requests are made unless configured +otherwise. -Also, given EXPERIMENTAL_OCSP and OpenSSL, the smtp transport gains -a "hosts_require_ocsp" option; a host-list for which an OCSP Stapling -is requested and required for the connection to proceed. The host(s) -should also be in "hosts_require_tls", and "tls_verify_certificates" -configured for the transport. +The host(s) should also be in "hosts_require_tls", and +"tls_verify_certificates" configured for the transport. For the client to be able to verify the stapled OCSP the server must also supply, in its stapled information, any intermediate @@ -99,6 +79,9 @@ of the server certificate. There may be zero or one such. These intermediate certificates should be added to the server OCSP stapling file (named by tls_ocsp_file). +Note that the proof only covers the terminal server certificate, +not any of the chain from CA to it. + At this point in time, we're gathering feedback on use, to determine if it's worth adding complexity to the Exim daemon to periodically re-fetch OCSP files and somehow handling multiple files. @@ -107,8 +90,8 @@ OCSP files and somehow handling multiple files. OCSP server is supplied. The server URL may be included in the server certificate, if the CA is helpful. - One fail mode seen was the OCSP Signer cert expiring before the end - of vailidity of the OCSP proof. The checking done by Exim/OpenSSL + One failure mode seen was the OCSP Signer cert expiring before the end + of validity of the OCSP proof. The checking done by Exim/OpenSSL noted this as invalid overall, but the re-fetch script did not. @@ -1042,6 +1025,8 @@ Proxy Protocol Support Exim now has Experimental "Proxy Protocol" support. It was built on specifications from: http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.5/doc/proxy-protocol.txt +Above URL revised May 2014 to change version 2 spec: +http://git.1wt.eu/web?p=haproxy.git;a=commitdiff;h=afb768340c9d7e50d8e The purpose of this function is so that an application load balancer, such as HAProxy, can sit in front of several Exim servers and Exim @@ -1162,6 +1147,25 @@ QUIT +Certificate name checking +-------------------------------------------------------------- +The X509 certificates used for TLS are supposed be verified +that they are owned by the expected host. The coding of TLS +support to date has not made these checks. + +If built with EXPERIMENTAL_CERTNAMES defined, code is +included to do so, and a new smtp transport option +"tls_verify_cert_hostname" supported which takes a list of +names for which the checks must be made. The host must +also be in "tls_verify_hosts". + +Both Subject and Subject-Alternate-Name certificate fields +are supported, as are wildcard certificates (limited to +a single wildcard being the initial component of a 3-or-more +component FQDN). + + + -------------------------------------------------------------- End of file --------------------------------------------------------------