X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/users/heiko/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/d6e96b36bd210fc2dbf8830202ff4daf0720ef1a..09ae8f9f555a3cfe7c2887d920279d41fb88879c:/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt diff --git a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt index 0ed811ab5..09220857d 100644 --- a/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt +++ b/doc/doc-docbook/spec.xfpt @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ .set I "    " .macro copyyear -2013 +2014 .endmacro . ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @@ -10171,6 +10171,14 @@ number of larger units and output in Exim's normal time format, for example, .cindex "expansion" "case forcing" .cindex "&%uc%& expansion item" This forces the letters in the string into upper-case. + +.vitem &*${utf8clean:*&<&'string'&>&*}*& +.cindex "correction of invalid utf-8 sequences in strings" +.cindex "utf-8" "utf-8 sequences" +.cindex "incorrect utf-8" +.cindex "expansion" "utf-8 forcing" +.cindex "&%utf8clean%& expansion item" +This replaces any invalid utf-8 sequence in the string by the character &`?`&. .endlist @@ -11978,7 +11986,7 @@ other times, this variable is false. It is likely that you will need to coerce DNSSEC support on in the resolver library, by setting: .code -dns_use_dnssec = 1 +dns_dnssec_ok = 1 .endd Exim does not perform DNSSEC validation itself, instead leaving that to a @@ -13190,10 +13198,10 @@ See also the &'Policy controls'& section above. .row &%disable_ipv6%& "do no IPv6 processing" .row &%dns_again_means_nonexist%& "for broken domains" .row &%dns_check_names_pattern%& "pre-DNS syntax check" +.row &%dns_dnssec_ok%& "parameter for resolver" .row &%dns_ipv4_lookup%& "only v4 lookup for these domains" .row &%dns_retrans%& "parameter for resolver" .row &%dns_retry%& "parameter for resolver" -.row &%dns_use_dnssec%& "parameter for resolver" .row &%dns_use_edns0%& "parameter for resolver" .row &%hold_domains%& "hold delivery for these domains" .row &%local_interfaces%& "for routing checks" @@ -13814,6 +13822,17 @@ This option controls whether or not an IP address, given as a CSA domain, is reversed and looked up in the reverse DNS, as described in more detail in section &<>&. + +.option dns_dnssec_ok main integer -1 +.cindex "DNS" "resolver options" +.cindex "DNS" "DNSSEC" +If this option is set to a non-negative number then Exim will initialise the +DNS resolver library to either use or not use DNSSEC, overriding the system +default. A value of 0 coerces DNSSEC off, a value of 1 coerces DNSSEC on. + +If the resolver library does not support DNSSEC then this option has no effect. + + .option dns_ipv4_lookup main "domain list&!!" unset .cindex "IPv6" "DNS lookup for AAAA records" .cindex "DNS" "IPv6 lookup for AAAA records" @@ -13844,16 +13863,6 @@ to set in them. See &%dns_retrans%& above. -.option dns_use_dnssec main integer -1 -.cindex "DNS" "resolver options" -.cindex "DNS" "DNSSEC" -If this option is set to a non-negative number then Exim will initialise the -DNS resolver library to either use or not use DNSSEC, overriding the system -default. A value of 0 coerces DNSSEC off, a value of 1 coerces DNSSEC on. - -If the resolver library does not support DNSSEC then this option has no effect. - - .option dns_use_edns0 main integer -1 .cindex "DNS" "resolver options" .cindex "DNS" "EDNS0" @@ -27292,7 +27301,12 @@ It is usable in the RCPT ACL and valid only for single-recipient mails forwarded from one SMTP connection to another. If a recipient-verify callout connection is requested in the same ACL it is held open and used for the data, otherwise one is made after the ACL completes. -Note that routers are used in verify mode. + +Note that routers are used in verify mode. Note also that headers cannot be +modified by any of the post-data ACLs (DATA, MIME and DKIM). +Cutthrough delivery is not supported via transport-filters or when DKIM signing +of outgoing messages is done, because it sends data to the ultimate destination +before the entire message has been received from the source. Should the ultimate destination system positively accept or reject the mail, a corresponding indication is given to the source system and nothing is queued. @@ -27303,7 +27317,6 @@ line. Delivery in this mode avoids the generation of a bounce mail to a (possibly faked) sender when the destination system is doing content-scan based rejection. -Cutthrough delivery is not supported via transport-filters. .vitem &*control&~=&~debug/*&<&'options'&> @@ -27547,12 +27560,15 @@ warn dnslists = sbl.spamhaus.org : \ add_header = X-blacklisted-at: $dnslist_domain .endd The &%add_header%& modifier is permitted in the MAIL, RCPT, PREDATA, DATA, -MIME, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with +MIME, DKIM, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with receiving a message). The message must ultimately be accepted for &%add_header%& to have any significant effect. You can use &%add_header%& with any ACL verb, including &%deny%& (though this is potentially useful only in a RCPT ACL). +Headers will not be added to the message if the modifier is used in +DATA, MIME or DKIM ACLs for messages delivered by cutthrough routing. + Leading and trailing newlines are removed from the data for the &%add_header%& modifier; if it then contains one or more newlines that @@ -27646,12 +27662,15 @@ warn message = Remove internal headers remove_header = x-route-mail1 : x-route-mail2 .endd The &%remove_header%& modifier is permitted in the MAIL, RCPT, PREDATA, DATA, -MIME, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with +MIME, DKIM, and non-SMTP ACLs (in other words, those that are concerned with receiving a message). The message must ultimately be accepted for &%remove_header%& to have any significant effect. You can use &%remove_header%& with any ACL verb, including &%deny%&, though this is really not useful for any verb that doesn't result in a delivered message. +Headers will not be removed to the message if the modifier is used in +DATA, MIME or DKIM ACLs for messages delivered by cutthrough routing. + More than one header can be removed at the same time by using a colon separated list of header names. The header matching is case insensitive. Wildcards are not permitted, nor is list expansion performed, so you cannot use hostlists to @@ -27972,6 +27991,23 @@ This condition checks whether the sending host (the client) is authorized to send email. Details of how this works are given in section &<>&. +.new +.vitem &*verify&~=&~header_names_ascii*& +.cindex "&%verify%& ACL condition" +.cindex "&ACL;" "verifying header names only ASCII" +.cindex "header lines" "verifying header names only ASCII" +.cindex "verifying" "header names only ASCII" +This condition is relevant only in an ACL that is run after a message has been +received, that is, in an ACL specified by &%acl_smtp_data%& or +&%acl_not_smtp%&. It checks all header names (not the content) to make sure +there are no non-ASCII characters, also excluding control characters. The +allowable characters are decimal ASCII values 33 through 126. + +Exim itself will handle headers with non-ASCII characters, but it can cause +problems for downstream applications, so this option will allow their +detection and rejection in the DATA ACL's. +.wen + .vitem &*verify&~=&~header_sender/*&<&'options'&> .cindex "&%verify%& ACL condition" .cindex "&ACL;" "verifying sender in the header" @@ -28583,6 +28619,13 @@ deny condition = ${if isip4{$sender_host_address}} dnslists = some.list.example .endd +If an explicit key is being used for a DNS lookup and it may be an IPv6 +address you should specify alternate list separators for both the outer +(DNS list name) list and inner (lookup keys) list: +.code + dnslists = <; dnsbl.example.com/<|$acl_m_addrslist +.endd + .section "Rate limiting incoming messages" "SECTratelimiting" .cindex "rate limiting" "client sending" .cindex "limiting client sending rates" @@ -34322,7 +34365,8 @@ The message that is written is &"spool file is locked"&. .next .cindex "log" "smtp confirmation" .cindex "SMTP" "logging confirmation" -&%smtp_confirmation%&: The response to the final &"."& in the SMTP dialogue for +.cindex "LMTP" "logging confirmation" +&%smtp_confirmation%&: The response to the final &"."& in the SMTP or LMTP dialogue for outgoing messages is added to delivery log lines in the form &`C=`&<&'text'&>. A number of MTAs (including Exim) return an identifying string in this response. @@ -36339,7 +36383,9 @@ disabled by setting DISABLE_DKIM=yes in Local/Makefile. Exim's DKIM implementation allows to .olist Sign outgoing messages: This function is implemented in the SMTP transport. -It can co-exist with all other Exim features, including transport filters. +It can co-exist with all other Exim features +(including transport filters) +except cutthrough delivery. .next Verify signatures in incoming messages: This is implemented by an additional ACL (acl_smtp_dkim), which can be called several times per message, with @@ -36430,6 +36476,10 @@ used. Verification of DKIM signatures in incoming email is implemented via the &%acl_smtp_dkim%& ACL. By default, this ACL is called once for each syntactically(!) correct signature in the incoming message. +A missing ACL definition defaults to accept. +If any ACL call does not acccept, the message is not accepted. +If a cutthrough delivery was in progress for the message it is +summarily dropped (having wasted the transmission effort). To evaluate the signature in the ACL a large number of expansion variables containing the signature status and its details are set up during the