X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/users/heiko/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/2603405406a9065839e28d938b63f4ce2816fdc2..dd3f6d3071e2caad286e15a06364cd27b13ac0ff:/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog?ds=inline

diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
index 74485e0a6..dba38e56f 100644
--- a/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
+++ b/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.25 2004/11/12 11:39:34 ph10 Exp $
+$Cambridge: exim/doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.27 2004/11/12 15:03:40 ph10 Exp $
 
 Change log file for Exim from version 4.21
 -------------------------------------------
@@ -102,6 +102,17 @@ Exim version 4.44
 27. Added HAVE_SYS_STATVFS_H to the os.h file for Linux, as it has had this
     support for a long time. Removed HAVE_SYS_VFS_H.
 
+28. Installed the latest version of exipick from John Jetmore.
+
+29. In an address list, if the pattern was not a regular expression, an empty
+    subject address (from a bounce message) matched only if the pattern was an
+    empty string. Non-empty patterns were not even tested. This was the wrong
+    because it is perfectly reasonable to use an empty address as part of a
+    database query. An empty address is now tested by patterns that are
+    lookups. However, all the other forms of pattern expect the subject to
+    contain a local part and a domain, and therefore, for them, an empty
+    address still always fails if the pattern is not itself empty.
+
 
 Exim version 4.43
 -----------------