X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/c11d665dab975691024f9231ad93c65bef7e5df4..4e9ed49f8f12eb331b29bd5b6dc3693c520fddc2:/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4002 diff --git a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4002 b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4002 index d9849c341..fcfae698b 100644 --- a/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4002 +++ b/test/scripts/4000-scanning/4002 @@ -1,242 +1,45 @@ -# content scan interface: spamassassin +# ACL regex= test # -# The spooled file for scanning includes the test-runner's user name -# hence size varies. Munge that. -munge scanfile_size +# These tests are copies from testcase 4000; +# they should be removed from there but I don't +# run spamassassin so can't verify the change. # -# -# A good-comms test, returning not-spam. -# (we could use a second one that returns is-spam...) -server 7833 -SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK ->Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0 -> ->Spam detection software, running on the system "demo", ->has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original ->message has been attached to this so you can view it or label ->similar future email. If you have any questions, see ->@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. -> ->Content preview: test [...] -> ->Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required) -> -> pts rule name description ->---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ->-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header -> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header -> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header -> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header -> -*eof -**** -exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs +exim -odi -bs ehlo test.ex -mail from: +mail from:<> rcpt to: data -Content-type: text/plain +From: Test person +To: Me +Subject: A real test message +Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:13:04 +0100 +Message-ID: <41C2F849.3060203@projectile.test.ex> -test +OK, this should look like a genuine message. . quit **** -# -# -# -# -# Server spec line with timeout option, not exercised -# (could we cut down the massive content?) -server 7833 -SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK ->Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0 -> ->Spam detection software, running on the system "demo", ->has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original ->message has been attached to this so you can view it or label ->similar future email. If you have any questions, see ->@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. -> ->Content preview: test [...] -> ->Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required) -> -> pts rule name description ->---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ->-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header -> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header -> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header -> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header -> -*eof -**** -exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='127.0.0.1 7833 retry=10s' -ehlo test.ex -mail from: -rcpt to: -data -Content-type: text/plain - -test -. -quit -**** -# -# -# -# Server spec line with timeout option, exercised -server -i 2 7833 -SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK ->Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0 -> ->Spam detection software, running on the system "demo", ->has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original ->message has been attached to this so you can view it or label ->similar future email. If you have any questions, see ->@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. -> ->Content preview: test [...] -> ->Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required) -> -> pts rule name description ->---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ->-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header -> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header -> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header -> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header -> -*eof -**** -exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='127.0.0.1 7833 retry=4s' +exim -odi -bs ehlo test.ex -mail from: +mail from:<> rcpt to: data -Content-type: text/plain +From: Test person +To: Me +Subject: A real test message +Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 16:13:04 +0100 +Message-ID: <41C2F849.3060203@projectile.test.ex> +FakeReject: test fakereject +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain -test -. -quit -**** -# -# -# -# Multiple servers, prioritised, with timeout spec; first one fails -# List separator changed -server 7833 -SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK ->Spam: False ; 4.5 / 5.0 -> ->Spam detection software, running on the system "demo", ->has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original ->message has been attached to this so you can view it or label ->similar future email. If you have any questions, see ->@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. -> ->Content preview: test [...] -> ->Content analysis details: (4.5 points, 5.0 required) -> -> pts rule name description ->---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ->-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -> 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header -> 1.0 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header -> 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header -> 1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header -> 0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header -> -*eof -**** -exim -odi -oMt fromuser -bs -DOPT='<; 127.0.0.1 7833 ; HOSTIPV4 7834 pri=2 tmo=2s' -ehlo test.ex -mail from: -rcpt to: -data -Content-type: text/plain +OK, this should look like a genuine message, but +it will trip on THIS gazornenplaz REGEX. -test +This checks proper release of variable used for mime_regex +firstname@foobar.com +secondname@blaz.com +thirdname@blaz.com . quit **** -# -#