X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/9cbad13b652da19396511434b18e88533c8f9901..1508acb8629a6ac1517ab524a9f29257a2335d5e:/src/README.UPDATING diff --git a/src/README.UPDATING b/src/README.UPDATING index 0d729a384..6a820bc7c 100644 --- a/src/README.UPDATING +++ b/src/README.UPDATING @@ -26,9 +26,13 @@ The rest of this document contains information about changes in 4.xx releases that might affect a running system. -Exim version 4.78 +Exim version 4.80 ----------------- + * BEWARE backwards-incompatible changes in SSL libraries, thus the version + bump. See points below for details. + Also an LDAP data returned format change. + * The value of $tls_peerdn is now print-escaped when written to the spool file in a -tls_peerdn line, and unescaped when read back in. We received reports of values with embedded newlines, which caused spool file corruption. @@ -63,12 +67,23 @@ Exim version 4.78 security for compatibility. Exim is now defaulting to higher security and rewarding more modern clients. + If the option tls_dhparams is set and the parameters loaded from the file + have a bit-count greater than the new option tls_dh_max_bits, then the file + will now be ignored. If this affects you, raise the tls_dh_max_bits limit. + We suspect that most folks are using dated defaults and will not be affected. + * Ldap lookups returning multi-valued attributes now separate the attributes with only a comma, not a comma-space sequence. Also, an actual comma within a returned attribute is doubled. This makes it possible to parse the attribute as a comma-separated list. Note the distinction from multiple attributes being returned, where each one is a name=value pair. + If you are currently splitting the results from LDAP upon a comma, then you + should check carefully to see if adjustments are needed. + + This change lets cautious folks distinguish "comma used as separator for + joining values" from "comma inside the data". + * accept_8bitmime now defaults on, which is not RFC compliant but is better suited to today's Internet. See http://cr.yp.to/smtp/8bitmime.html for a sane rationale. Those who wish to be strictly RFC compliant, or know that @@ -77,6 +92,71 @@ Exim version 4.78 new option, you can safely force it off before upgrading, to decouple configuration changes from the binary upgrade while remaining RFC compliant. + * The GnuTLS support has been mostly rewritten, to use APIs which don't cause + deprecation warnings in GnuTLS 2.12.x. As part of this, these three options + are no longer supported: + + gnutls_require_kx + gnutls_require_mac + gnutls_require_protocols + + Their functionality is entirely subsumed into tls_require_ciphers. In turn, + tls_require_ciphers is no longer an Exim list and is not parsed by Exim, but + is instead given to gnutls_priority_init(3), which expects a priority string; + this behaviour is much closer to the OpenSSL behaviour. See: + + http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/manual/html_node/Priority-Strings.html + + for fuller documentation of the strings parsed. The three gnutls_require_* + options are still parsed by Exim and, for this release, silently ignored. + A future release will add warnings, before a later still release removes + parsing entirely and the presence of the options will be a configuration + error. + + Note that by default, GnuTLS will not accept RSA-MD5 signatures in chains. + A tls_require_ciphers value of NORMAL:%VERIFY_ALLOW_SIGN_RSA_MD5 may + re-enable support, but this is not supported by the Exim maintainers. + Our test suite no longer includes MD5-based certificates. + + This rewrite means that Exim will continue to build against GnuTLS in the + future, brings Exim closer to other GnuTLS applications and lets us add + support for SNI and other features more readily. We regret that it wasn't + feasible to retain the three dropped options. + + * If built with TLS support, then Exim will now validate the value of + the main section tls_require_ciphers option at start-up. Before, this + would cause a STARTTLS 4xx failure, now it causes a failure to start. + Running with a broken configuration which causes failures that may only + be left in the logs has been traded off for something more visible. This + change makes an existing problem more prominent, but we do not believe + anyone would deliberately be running with an invalid tls_require_ciphers + option. + + This also means that library linkage issues caused by conflicts of some + kind might take out the main daemon, not just the delivery or receiving + process. Conceivably some folks might prefer to continue delivering + mail plaintext when their binary is broken in this way, if there is a + server that is a candidate to receive such mails that does not advertise + STARTTLS. Note that Exim is typically a setuid root binary and given + broken linkage problems that cause segfaults, we feel it is safer to + fail completely. (The check is not done as root, to ensure that problems + here are not made worse by the check). + + * The "tls_dhparam" option has been updated, so that it can now specify a + path or an identifier for a standard DH prime from one of a few RFCs. + The default for OpenSSL is no longer to not use DH but instead to use + one of these standard primes. The default for GnuTLS is no longer to use + a file in the spool directory, but to use that same standard prime. + The option is now used by GnuTLS too. If it points to a path, then + GnuTLS will use that path, instead of a file in the spool directory; + GnuTLS will attempt to create it if it does not exist. + + To preserve the previous behaviour of generating files in the spool + directory, set "tls_dhparam = historic". Since prior releases of Exim + ignored tls_dhparam when using GnuTLS, this can safely be done before + the upgrade. + + Exim version 4.77 ----------------- @@ -87,6 +167,9 @@ Exim version 4.77 problem. Prior to this release, supported values were "TLS1" and "SSL3", so you should be able to update configuration prior to update. + [nb: gnutls_require_protocols removed in Exim 4.80, instead use + tls_require_ciphers to provide a priority string; see notes above] + * The match_{string1}{string2} expansion conditions no longer subject string2 to string expansion, unless Exim was built with the new "EXPAND_LISTMATCH_RHS" option. Too many people have inadvertently created