X-Git-Url: https://git.exim.org/exim.git/blobdiff_plain/82dbd376b5de9b9d91e93e91a4e058a80a43de99..0e66b3b655cefaf20e3ce7347b45e158c3427831:/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt diff --git a/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt b/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt index 2f44fce26..e7a0d0668 100644 --- a/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt +++ b/doc/doc-txt/experimental-spec.txt @@ -1178,6 +1178,10 @@ admins of the target server. The attack surface presented by (a) is thought to be smaller than that of the set of root CAs. +It also allows the server to declare (implicitly) that +connections to it should use TLS. An MITM could simply +fail to pass on a server's STARTTLS. + DANE scales better than having to maintain (and side-channel communicate) copies of server certificates for every possible target server. It also scales @@ -1202,12 +1206,12 @@ There are no changes to Exim specific to server-side operation of DANE. The TLSA record for the server may have "certificate -usage" of DANE_TA(2) or DANE_EE(3). The latter specifies +usage" of DANE-TA(2) or DANE-EE(3). The latter specifies the End Entity directly, i.e. the certificate involved is that of the server (and should be the sole one transmitted during the TLS handshake); this is appropriate for a single system, using a self-signed certificate. - DANE_TA usage is effectively declaring a specific CA + DANE-TA usage is effectively declaring a specific CA to be used; this might be a private CA or a public, well-known one. A private CA at simplest is just a self-signed certificate which is used to sign @@ -1219,7 +1223,7 @@ the entire certificate chain from CA to server-certificate. If a public CA is used then all clients must be primed with it (losing one advantage of DANE) - but the attack surface is reduced from all public CAs to that single CA. -DANE_TA is commonly used for several services and/or +DANE-TA is commonly used for several services and/or servers, each having a TLSA query-domain CNAME record, all of which point to a single TLSA record. @@ -1236,13 +1240,13 @@ is useful for quickly generating TLSA records; and commands like are workable for 4th-field hashes. -For use with the DANE_TA model, server certificates +For use with the DANE-TA model, server certificates must have a correct name (SubjectName or SubjectAltName). The use of OCSP-stapling should be considered, allowing for fast revocation of certificates (which would otherwise be limited by the DNS TTL on the TLSA records). However, -this is likely to only be usable with DANE_TA. NOTE: the +this is likely to only be usable with DANE-TA. NOTE: the default of requesting OCSP for all hosts is modified iff DANE is in use, to: @@ -1253,10 +1257,10 @@ DANE is in use, to: The (new) variable $tls_out_tlsa_usage is a bitfield with numbered bits set for TLSA record usage codes. The zero above means DANE was not in use, -the four means that only DANE_TA usage TLSA records were -found. If the definition of hosts_require_ocsp or -hosts_request_ocsp includes the string "tls_out_tlsa_usage", -they are re-expanded in time to control the OCSP request. +the four means that only DANE-TA usage TLSA records were +found. If the definition of hosts_request_ocsp includes the +string "tls_out_tlsa_usage", they are re-expanded in time to +control the OCSP request. This modification of hosts_request_ocsp is only done if it has the default value of "*". Admins who change it, and @@ -1271,9 +1275,15 @@ hosts_try_dane and hosts_require_dane. They do the obvious thing. DANE will only be usable if the target host has DNSSEC-secured MX, A and TLSA records. +A TLSA lookup will be done if either of the above options match +and the host-lookup succeded using dnssec. +If the TLSA lookup succeeds, a TLS connection will be required +for the host. + (TODO: specify when fallback happens vs. when the host is not used) If dane is in use the following transport options are ignored: + hosts_require_tls tls_verify_hosts tls_try_verify_hosts tls_verify_certificates